Where, exactly, is the 'Didn't do exactly what I want so fuck this dude' option?
EDIT: Technically speaking, the GMs throw just about all reports away.
Last edited by Bombast; 05-18-2015 at 02:12 AM.
Now that you've been sufficiently called on the carpet; your move, rhetorical, flatulent, fustian, gaseous, gassy, grandiloquent, oratorical, orotund, windy, bloated, elevated, florid, flowery, grandiose, highfalutin (also hifalutin), high-flown, high-sounding, inflated, lofty, ornate, pompous, pontifical, pretentious, stilted, tumid, turgid; overdone, verbose, wordy - BOMBASTIC.



Harassment, though the way you word it of course makes it more them harassing.
That said, the Alliance agreed to it, and if they did voice objections in an aggressive way and refused to do so, it can be seen as harassment. Just pointing out.

They have said that you can kick if people aren't playing the way the rest of the group wants. Its been pointed out in many threads where people were kicked for viewing cutscenes as the rest wanted to speed run. Not following the strategy is surely going to fall in that same category. This thing about reporting people for the kick is just dumb...
That said, I wouldn't have kicked you for it. You should just stop typing in chat if you don't want to follow the strategy. Stop arguing with people about it. They most likely wouldn't have even known that you did your own thing if you didn't draw attention to it.
Last edited by Cirgellon; 05-19-2015 at 04:04 AM.

I would love to see a source for this where the GMs stated that not following the group strategy is a reasonable reason for botting someone from the Party. And where kicking someone for wathcing a cutscene is also looked at as a reasonable excuse. if you cannot find these sources then please, don't spout this nonsense.They have said that you can kick if people aren't playing the way the rest of the group wants. Its been pointed out in many threads where people were kicked for viewing cutscenes as the rest wanted to speed run. Not following the strategy is surely going to fall in that same category. This thing about reporting people for the kick is just dumb...
That said, I wouldn't have kicked you for it. You should just stop typing in chat if you don't want to follow the strategy. Stop arguing with people about it. They most likely wouldn't have even known that y9u did your own thing if you didn't draw attention to it.
I can confirm that SE's policy on "Vote Kick Abuse" is painfully close to "Vote Kick Abuse doesn't exist". You're perfectly allowed to kick people for being new, for being undergeared, for not doing what you want them to do. They call that "differing playstyles", and if you kick someone because they watched a cutscene, then that's the same, and not considered abuse, nor harassment. They basically said "If the majority of a group decides that this is a no cutscene run, then kicking someone for watching cutscenes is okay". I had a discussion about this with a GM. Sadly, the rule of thumb as far as kickvotes go is "Kick or be kicked", if there's a disagreement.I would love to see a source for this where the GMs stated that not following the group strategy is a reasonable reason for botting someone from the Party. And where kicking someone for wathcing a cutscene is also looked at as a reasonable excuse. if you cannot find these sources then please, don't spout this nonsense.
The only thing that's "really" prohibited, and labeled "Vote Kick Abuse" is kicking someone intentionally before a boss fight with the intention of keeping them from obtaining loot or the dungeon clear. Kicking for any other reason is fair game.
Not talking about threads. Talking about SE's policy on what does and what doesn't constitute "Vote Kick Abuse".I would love to see the thread where the general consensus was 'kicking for watching cut scenes is fine.'
Because every thread I've seen like that, the overall view was that the people kicking for that are douchebags of the highest order of magnitude, and that they should go back to LoL and get back to trying to get people banned for not playing every match at a professional level.
Last edited by Riepah; 05-19-2015 at 04:27 AM.

I'd probably put in the effort to get you that source if you weren't acting like such an angry child. Grow up, kid...I would love to see a source for this where the GMs stated that not following the group strategy is a reasonable reason for botting someone from the Party. And where kicking someone for wathcing a cutscene is also looked at as a reasonable excuse. if you cannot find these sources then please, don't spout this nonsense.
Last edited by Cirgellon; 05-19-2015 at 04:12 AM.

Why does everyone use such a lame excuse such as this one, and many other common ones when asked to present a source? Makes you wonder, hmmm. And no im not angry, Ive not been kicked for anything stupid. But i dislike people saying "facts" with no backup from a reliable source.

I've seen screen shots and you can indeed vote kick for any reason. You can vote kick for low dps, watching cutscenes, dying, or not following the strat. I have vote kicked a df FCoB party member because their Garuda egi did more dps than them. They probably reported me but no gm will ever reprimand me for this.Why does everyone use such a lame excuse such as this one, and many other common ones when asked to present a source? Makes you wonder, hmmm. And no im not angry, Ive not been kicked for anything stupid. But i dislike people saying "facts" with no backup from a reliable source.
The only time it is reportable is if the kick was preceeded by some form of verbal harassment. Then the harassment can be reported, but not the kick itself.
Edit: I found the gm response on this. Essentially if there is a conflict of any sort which arises players can use the vote kick option as a means to resolve the conflict. Players are not limited to only kicking for the reasons listed and can kick for other reasons as they creatively see fit. The OP and dps friend had a conflict where the alliance agreed upon a specific strat and they vocalized their dissent. The group opted to resolve this by vote kicking the friend, which is a valid reason.
Source
Last edited by PetiteMalFleur; 05-20-2015 at 07:03 AM.



I like how both sides of the "where's your source bro?" argument seem to have conveniently missed this post...
For the people who are too source-allergic to actually click the link before continuing to argue: "players are allowed to kick others for reasons of 'different playstyles' ... even if there is no option for this and the categorisation may be wrong in this case."
So yeah, that's as straight forward of an answer as possible. It's definitely allowed.
When in doubt, assume sarcasm

Probably because you act like an angry child instead of trying to have a civil discussion. You clearly didn't just ask me to provide a source... When no one responds well to you, one would think that you would start to realize where the problem is.Why does everyone use such a lame excuse such as this one, and many other common ones when asked to present a source? Makes you wonder, hmmm. And no im not angry, Ive not been kicked for anything stupid. But i dislike people saying "facts" with no backup from a reliable source.
Why don't you provide some proof that they consider this vote kick abuse? I would love to see it...
Last edited by Cirgellon; 05-20-2015 at 11:45 PM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.



Reply With Quote


