The Ethics of Optional Item Sales

[GenJoe]

I'm not even going to try and work with this logic. You're assuming that players will be fair with their pricing on premium items. Unless SE does what WoW does and sets a definite gil price on [insert premium item here], that will not ever happen. Period. People can claim they want to help other players all they want. What they're really saying is "let me legally pay $10 and suddenly have 10 million gil in my pocket." Just be honest and admit it already.

My stance still stands. Cash shop should be system-side services (transfers, name change, etc.), fantasia, and un-tradeable vanity items. SE's cash shop is fine as it is.

Players don't HAVE to sell it at a "fair" price.
RMTs sell gil at about $3/million.

That is 5 million gil for $15. $15 being a month's sub.

You don't think there will be enough people to buy a month's sub for 5 million gil? People will likely pay 10-20 million + for a month's sub.. So RMTs will either have to reduce their gil pricing to be competitive, or quit. RMTs simply cannot be competitive with player run economy because most people perceive RMT prices to be exorbitant.. When players trade game-time for gil, prices of gil will drop beyond the point of profitability for most people, especially a company with the overhead.

"let me legally pay $10 and suddenly have 10 million gil in my pocket." Just be honest and admit it already.

I admit that, I see absolutely no problem with it if it's taking place within the economy and providing flow of gil.
How's buying gil from another player any worse than buying gil from RMT? At least if SE condoned the player based RMT economy, prices will not be exorbitant and gil WILL trade places more freely. I would LOVE to be able to use some of my gil.. except there's nothing I can buy with it. If they introduced a month's sub as an in-game item I'd gladly pay 30 million gil for a month's worth.