Quote Originally Posted by Lavieh View Post
Lol, I can't believe people think this XD. You could do every dungeon in this game without Protect and be just fine. I don't think I'd judge a healer on how they stoneskin in dungeons. I almost never expect a SCH to use unless they need to mitigate more damage than an adlo would. Which is very seldom. Stoneskin is a very niche skill on SCH, very niche.
Well sounds like you've just had lazy Scholars then, in dungeons and HM trials it's always great to have that extra protection, someone will bound to get hit even if there isn't an AoE coming, so you can stay longer in Cleric Stance. So if you think it's niche because you haven't seen many Scholars do it then I'm sorry for your experiences.

Quote Originally Posted by SulwynCaliope View Post
I AM not hating on WHMs at all which you seem to think I am. I have no animosity at all towards WHMs. I love my WHM partner in coil.

I will repeat myself yet again. Our in battle skills are completely IRRELEVANT to this conversation. Can we stop turning this into a WHM vs SCH whine fest because that's NOT what this convo is about. This is about a single QUALITY OF LIFE skill that no one can tell me why should be WHM only besides the fact that it makes them feel special. Can we all agree that SSII has no effect on in battle balance at all? Please?
It's sad that people are still trying to make this a healer vs healer thing. I agree entirely with you, especially as someone who plays both and likes them both but is only really good at one.