Women and Armor!

[Riepah]

Because at this point, why bother. Amused refuses to acknowledge obvious sexism (if it doesn't bother you, if you don't care, that's one thing, but sticking your head in the sand and saying "lalala, nothing sexist about gear covering skin on guys and exposing skin on girls" is, frankly, ridiculous)

Yes, it's their "artistic vision". That doesn't mean it's immune to criticism or automatically makes it non-sexist.

I think with a female character called "Creamy Goodness" you're doing much more to objectify females than any skimpy armor could, anyway.

1. Objectification...is a VERB.

No. No, it is not. I stopped reading there.