mmorpg's review

[Zkieve]

LOL. Please. Like the claim about a "poor plot" when the reviever quite evidently saw only the first cutscenes for each city and nothing more.

"oh this book has a poor plot"

"really?"

"YEah, I've read it up to page 5, and I tell you, it sucks!"

It's a rollercoaster of laughs to see always the usual haters (that are seemingly insanely obsessed with this game, since they can't seem to be able to just move on with their life and continue to haunt the forums to spew some more venom) bending over thrice to defend this farce of a review. Not that they even read it. The score is negative, so it MUST be defended at all costs!

"Hey, the grahics aren't that great"

"why?"

"The interface requires too many clicks to do simple things!"

"ah... ok".

Seriously, if he did play the game long enough , that 5.1 would had been a 2.0.
The beef here i tough it was about when it was reviewed.

I can point you to lots of X10 times worst reviews right here in this forums that are all pretty much spot on,
from players who played all the way to 50, so that "he did not play long enough" is a double edged sword as an argument.
Im not going to lower myself to discuss about "haters" and "fanboys".old argument is old.

and for your INFO,
to me that score is a positive.

[BruceyBruceyBangBang]

Seriously, if he did play the game long enough , that 5.1 would had been a 2.0.
The beef here i tough it was about when it was reviewed.

I can point you to lots of X10 times worst reviews right here in this forums that are all pretty much spot on,
from players who played all the way to 50, so that "he did not play long enough" is a double edged sword as an argument.
Im not going to lower myself to discuss about "haters" and "fanboys".old argument is old.

and for your INFO,
to me that score is a positive.

They are not spot on when they label auto-attack as a rumor. They are actually driving even more people away by not acknowledging there is a patch in a few days after their review that could very well give them what was missing.

The poor research actually did more harm than most people think. Whether it be their ignorance or the fact that SE doesn't sponsor MMORPG.com. This is the way of the reviewer. Lazy, incompetent opinion blogs with bias written throughout the pages.

[Abriael]

Seriously, if he did play the game long enough , that 5.1 would had been a 2.0.

And says who, pray tell?

The beef here i tough it was about when it was reviewed.

There are plenty beefs. The timing is horrible, and the review is all kinds of a trainwreck under basically every point of view. Massive use of negative hyperbole, loss of positive areas of the game missed and some positives described as negatives (the plot? LOL), complete lack of even the slightest technical knowledge of how to write a basic review, simply didn't play the game (which means lack of journalistic integrity) and so forth.

If this review was a legit one, journalists could just log into the game an hour, take four pictures of the first crap they see, then go to some forum to copy-paste all the complaints they can find, reword them a little, add a snarky conclusive remark and an arbitrary score, and call it a review.

Boy, the gaming writer job has become easy...