mmorpg's review

[Delsus]

It does when you're posting criticism of MMORPG.com on MMORPG.com's forums.

Of course, you know that now :-p

All mmorpg.com's ban hammer om me and Abriael shows is that they have no integrity at all, I was calling the reviewer a retard, stupid, daft etc and got banned for trolling, if i should have been banned for anything it should have been for inapropriate laguage, but they banned me for trolling because I was doin what everyone on here has done which is calling the reviewer retarded for this review, but meh guess when my ban is lifted imma have to spam the reviewer with PMs

[Nilheim]

All mmorpg.com's ban hammer om me and Abriael shows is that they have no integrity at all, I was calling the reviewer a retard, stupid, daft etc and got banned for trolling, if i should have been banned for anything it should have been for inapropriate laguage, but they banned me for trolling because I was doin what everyone on here has done which is calling the reviewer retarded for this review, but meh guess when my ban is lifted imma have to spam the reviewer with PMs

This makes you sound like an angry child throwing a tantrum and insulting people because you don't agree with them. That doesn't make you right, and it certainly does a poor job showing you're the one who's not retarded.

The guy wrote a review, get over it already. He didn't insult you either, so be mature and don't insult him cause it really doesn't help your case.

[Delsus]

This makes you sound like an angry child throwing a tantrum and insulting people because you don't agree with them. That doesn't make you right, and it certainly does a poor job showing you're the one who's not retarded.

The guy wrote a review, get over it already. He didn't insult you either, so be mature and don't insult him cause it really doesn't help your case.

Any reputable reviewer would think that theres the first major patch in the games history, so would hold it off for 4 days, there are only 2 logical reasons they chose to hold off a review until 4 days before the first major patch:

1. They didnt know the patch was coming out, which means they do not keep up with the information SE gives us, which is enforced by them saying confirmed changes are rumours.

2. They want to give FFXIV a final kick before 1.18, which is backed up buy the obiviously biased view that doesnt mention sidequests, NMs, behest changes etc, that review is exactly what I saw at release, yes there hasnt been many changes but there have been and they should have been mentioned.

This review is badly timed, misses out potentialy positive changes and the reviewer thinks official information are just rumours, it is full of things like this.

By all means if you think the game is crap say its crap, as long as its at a decent time by which I mean between MINOR patches or after a major patch, not less than 1 week before a major patch we have known when this patch is coming out for about 2 weeks which is plenty of time to stop a review going on the website.

It doesnt take a rocket scientist to know that the words "battle reform" mean there will be big changes coming, whether its for better or worse doesnt matter at all, changes are changes and I can guarentee that the game will be completly differant when the reforms are done.

This review will be obsolete in 3 days now, and if its not re-reviewed after 1.18 or at the latest 1.19, the have absolutly 0 credability because of them wanting to review it 4 days before a patch that will be game changing, and that could improve it

[Naqaj]

I was calling the reviewer a retard, stupid, daft etc and got banned for trolling

summarizes most of the "constructive feedback"
/thread