So exactly how blasphemous would it be for a dps (drg) to go outside the "accepted" norm of 44crit/31 det and use a few points of accuracy for the last 5 or 6 melds that really taper off success wise? I'm currently 53/75 and about to move on to tIV materia. Till now I have spirit bound all my own materia, and haven't been very lucky with obtaining useful IVs. Almost 100 pieces of gear so far with about another 30 to go and only 3 IVs.
I'm saving up money for personal housing and I'm having a hard time justifying millions in materia cost to max out crit/det when likely in the next patch better weapons/upgrades will be available. The math seems to imply that secondaries are meager amount of the overall damage, and further that 5-8 points those stat points are trivial themselves as a part of the whole 75. I am almost ALWAYS on the receiving end of beatings from RNG so failures at 400k a pop, or hours and hours of spirit binding are absolutely unappealing.
My static is semi-casual and only on t7 at this point, so the likelihood of clearing t9 before the next update is seeming unlikely. As I upgrade I'd like to be able to be flexible and it seems like just pushing the upgrade to novus would benefit me from the weapon damage boost. It would end up something like 39 crit/ 28 det / 8 acc.
If I recall correctly the success rate is as follows on tIV.
44 stat = 100% > 100% > 100% > 100% > 100% > 100% > 96% > 90% > 82% > 72% > 60%
31 stat = 100% > 100% > 96% > 88% > 80% > 72% > 66% > 60%
I know some people are always going to be quick to judge when not min/maxed, but I'm looking for a response from those of you with logic and reason to put this in perspective rather than those with blinders on for min/max. Is this a bad idea for a DPS?