Disagreeing with me is not "not constructive." Your failed attempts at presenting "arguments" is not constructive. If you actually had a legitimate point to make or anything more than attempts at twisting what someone says into something else entirely, then you'd be constructive.

Aside from Garuda, which looks like crap, having severely poor quality and a distinct lack of animation, the Egis look "fine." However, looking "fine" (or not) is not the primary issue I've been voicing. The issue is that they don't have an FF feel to their visual design. What they look like is "generic MMO pet class' pet," and even there, WoW's Warlock's pets had more personality to them than the Egis do. What we get in FFXIV feels more like the Sorcerer pets in DCUO, as far as visuals go, and those still have more detail to them.

As far as resources, the primary model and animations are all already there. You can see them anytime you go into a Primal fight. That's if they were to go the route of really giving them a more solid "FF" feel and making the Egis actually look like their primal counterparts, just on a smaller scale (though likely a larger scale than the current Egi size).

If they were to just make Garuda-Egi's model and animations better, and more on par with Ifrit-Egi and Titan-Egi, then that would require more work most likely as it would require redesigning the model and adding animations that don't already exist.

Also, "good enough" doesn't mean "can't be improved" or even "shouldn't be improved." The game mounts we had at release were good enough, but that didn't stop them from adding more. The class/job options before they added Arcanist/smn/sch was "good enough" but they still added Arcanist/smn/sch, and they're still adding more classes and even a new race. The macro icons were good enough, but they still redesigned them. If "good enough" were reason to never change anything, the game would stagnate and die.