Results -9 to 0 of 70

Thread: SCH vs WHM

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Player
    Hitome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    210
    Character
    Hito Yu
    World
    Midgardsormr
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 50
    SCH/SCH > WHM/SCH >>>> WHM/WHM

    Whispering stacks. Fey illumination can be used in succession for 40 full seconds. Fey covenant, one of the biggest buffs I see ignored on these forums quite frequently, times 2 for 40 full seconds of magic resistance. Four healers, two bot raid healers. 6 lustrates at any given time with possibility of 12 in burst or 4 lustrates and 2 soils used in succession and not stacked. Improved virus x2. SCH efficiency greatly exceeds WHM efficiency, freeing up BRD manapool to be used strictly for increasing SMN and BLM DPS. Lustrate >> benediction (way too long of a CD). Two healers that can use preemptive shielding on the entire raid and the tanks >>>>>>>> two healers who can use crappy regen from medica 2 (less than rous'd whispering) and regen/stoneskin on a tank where stoneskin doesn't stack and consumes too much MP most of the time to justify the cast.

    Have too much healing? One SCH can use a DPS improving pet. DoTs > direct damage that WHM offers.

    Only reason I'd ever want a WHM is for holy spam on fights where it doesn't even matter.
    (4)
    Last edited by Hitome; 01-09-2014 at 05:17 PM.