Balancing Bard and Ranger isn't a issue because it comes down to the value of each Job. Bard is a must have for any group because of its ability to provide TP and MP when groups need them for heavy MP and TP consuming fights which makes them valued outside of their normal role of DD. Rangers will not be capable of such ability because it focus more on damage making it lack skills that would benefit the group outside of its normal role of DD.
but if this is what you believe is ideal for the game then I'm not going to try to change your mind. As of now we can only wait and see what SE will do with the 2nd Jobs of each class.
Your argument would seem to invalidate the existence of rangers. You either get bards who are balanced to not only provide acceptable dps but also utility or.. you get rangers who will not be vastly better at dps and don't provide the necissary utility
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.