Results -9 to 0 of 156

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4,948
    The summer event was not a quest. Trading some ash to an NPC is not a quest. Trading Philosophy to Auriana is not a quest, trading Odin Mantles to Aelina is not a quest.
    then you could just as easily argue that most of the FFXI events weren't quests either, because they weren't. Many of them did not appear in the quest log. BUt go ahead, keep arguing over semantics and not the actual topic of the godforsaken thread.

    BOTH GAMES HAVE BOTH REPEATABLE AND NON REPEATABLE COMPONENTS TO EVENTS. Call them "quests," Call them "Minigames", call them undefinied pixlized pieces of crap, i don't care. it isn't relevant to the discussion.

    The point is NONE OF THIS points to whether or not players will be able to do the quests again the second time they run this event. Your view on whether or not that will happen is an opinion, and nothing you can post here will change that. That opinion isn't necessarily right or wrong either. But it IS an opinion.

    If not that's your proof right there, quests are not repeatable, fates and the event itself might be but the quests themselves, insofar, are not repeatable and thus the thread has a legitimate concern.
    You state this as if quests can not be repatable or can not be made repeatable. You also state this as if they can't wipe the record of quest completion from our save data. There are a million ways they could let us do the event again, not the least of which is modify the quest to be repeatable or unflag it as completed when the next event hits. We are getting repeatable quests in pathc 2.1, they have the power to do this. Neither you nor anyone else can say with any certainty that they won't or can't.

    Which is exactly what the OP (who you seem to be attacking) has been wanting, since the very start of this thread.
    I don't get where I "seem" to be attacking the OP. I don't attack anybody. I make arguments for and against things. My view one way or the other on an issue is not an attack on anybody nor is it meant to be viewed as one.

    The only thing I am "attacking" is the argument that we won't be able to do this event again if we completed it the first time. Nobody knows for sure whether we will or we wont, and I certainly hope we will. But you seem awfully convinced we won't despite there being no hard line facts or proof that show that we won't be able to. Stating "this quest is not repeatable" over and over does not change that. If anyone is against the OP it seems to be you since you seem to be arguing for the position that the OP won't be able to get what he wants.

    (Hit post limit)

    No need to get snippy because you were wrong,
    I'm not wrong, so I'm not getting snippy about it. What I am getting snippy about is people completely missing the point of what this thread is about.

    Nowhere did I say the OP doesn't have a valid concern. It is most certainly a valid concern. It is the people arguing with me right now who seem to be convinced that his concern will not be addressed, while offering no actual evidence to show that, and also making false assertions, like "Quests are not repeatable." when quests can indeed be repeatable, as we will be getting repeatable quests well before the event is scheduled to be run again.

    I don't know for sure whether or not the OP will get his wish, I certainly hope he does and I'm pretty confident about it because SE has made multiple comments on the issue of gender items in the past, so they seem to be aware of the issue. All we have in this thread are a bunch of cynics fuming that SE probably won't do it because it's SE, and then BSing around about quests anret repeatable, this is a quest that isn't a quest bla bla bla bla bla when none of it has anything to do with whether or not the OP will get his wish.

    SE clearly seems to be aware that there is an issue relating to gendered items, so I really don't see why you're all so sure they won't do anything about it.
    (0)
    Last edited by Alhanelem; 12-05-2013 at 12:37 PM.