Solution for SCH/SUM Pets...discuss

[Iecerint]

SE has said that they don't want to do Gambits because they don't want the decision tree to be automate-able.

I do think that pets could maybe be an exception, but it could cause problems if they ever implement a Puppetmaster-like class that relies on the pet rather than that is supplemented by the pet.

Being about to macro pet options should really be a no-brainer, though. I would be interested in an official response regarding why this isn't included.

[Gatzby_or_Holden]

SE has said that they don't want to do Gambits because they don't want the decision tree to be automate-able.

I do think that pets could maybe be an exception, but it could cause problems if they ever implement a Puppetmaster-like class that relies on the pet rather than that is supplemented by the pet.

Being about to macro pet options should really be a no-brainer, though. I would be interested in an official response regarding why this isn't included.

Well I can understand that line of thought. You make circumstantial commands viable in all circumstances well you run the risk of damn near botting. Specially for high level characters using their pets to farm mobs.

I should probably make it plain and clear that gambits would not apply in any way to YOUR character in what I'm talking about. Only for pets. I def agree though. Pets should supplement the player and not vice versa. For scholars I dont see that an issue, but for summoners, yeah I could def see what I proposed making it a puppet master class where you just sit back and spam ruin over and over. Cant really say I'm not at all familiar with Summoners

How do you work around it? And SCH or SUM?

[Tupsi]

SE has said that they don't want to do Gambits because they don't want the decision tree to be automate-able.

Which is funny...because we were supposed to get a gambit system for pets (and chocobo companion.)