Please buff Succor.

[Valiant]

That's great for a tank- unless you are actually suggesting whms are rolling regen on the entire raid group... in which case time and mana would be issues- especially for spike damage..taking the time in the middle of a fight to try to recast regen on the entire raid... with two whms... well.. you are better off GCD wise just spamming medica...

Is that what you are implying? That WHMs are rolling regens on the entire raid through entire fights? I just want to make sure I understand the "math" correctly.

Being that most fights are aoe heavy and if you have idiot dd, then yes it is more viable with 2 whms for better survivability than whm + sch. Solely do to the health restored from regens assuming both medica 2 is popped off plus atleast one regen, and 2 regens after a heavy hit since regen alone heals for more than 1 cure1.

[ApolloGenX]

Being that most fights are aoe heavy and if you have idiot dd, then yes it is more viable with 2 whms for better survivability than whm + sch.

Okay, so the assumption is that you heal with a medica... and then go around regenning multiple dps... because? Why? You assume the regens will just tick instead of be sniped? So, after massive damage, it makes sense to use single target regens on multiple targets instead of a couple quick group heals? Seems to me like a waste of GCDs...past 2 or 3 people, you have left others at low health for a while... so it sounds like you might need to pre-hot before the damage spike... and that requires rolling regen.

What fights do you just spend your time spamming regen on all your raid mates and then (if it hasn't expired by target number 8) casting medica 2? I would like to know?

Please prove this "math" with a use case. I keep hearing "Regen" tossed around with "group heals"... please explain when and where you use regen (not the medica 2 regen) as a group heal.

[Valiant]

Okay,

Please prove this "math" with a use case.

with 2 whms.. why not... did it that way in 1.0 with van darnus... regen kept people alive quite well due to tick potency.. 2.0 is no different medica 2 plus regen even from 1 whm is better than 1 aldo shield. and i already gave you the math from my sch and whm... my own medica2 + regen heals for more than aldo prevents. til that is nerfed or sch shields can stack 2 whms will always be more viable then whm sch

[ApolloGenX]

with 2 whms.. why not... did it that way in 1.0 with van darnus... regen kept people alive quite well due to tick potency.. 2.0 is no different medica 2 plus regen even from 1 whm is better than 1 aldo shield. and i already gave you the math from my sch and whm... my own medica2 + regen heals for more than aldo prevents. til that is nerfed or sch shields can stack 2 whms will always be more viable then whm sch

Why not? That's not an answer- I told you mana and GCDs. Maybe medica 2 + regen is great for healing on the tank during AE... of course you ignore lustrate. Now, tell me where you apply Medica 2 + regen to the entire group. You were talking about group heals.

Where? Tell me the fight you spam regen and medica 2 on the whole raid.

[Valiant]

Why not? That's not an answer- I told you mana and GCDs. Maybe medica 2 + regen is great for healing on the tank during AE... of course you ignore lustrate. Now, tell me where you apply Medica 2 + regen to the entire group. You were talking about group heals.

Where? Tell me the fight you spam regen and medica 2 on the whole raid.

lustrate requiers Aetherflow... now if you are gonna add that ill add benediction.. longer cd but heals 1 target to full.. better than 60% every min

[ApolloGenX]

lustrate requiers Aetherflow... now if you are gonna add that ill add benediction.. longer cd but heals 1 target to full.. better than 60% every min

Debateable... but irrelevant. You were talking group heals. Then you gave single target healing figures and are trying to portray that as a group heal figure.

I said your "math" is BS unless you can give me an example of a fight, where you sit spamming regen on the entire raid and medica 2. Otherwise, you don't achieve those numbers. I'm tired of people mis-representing whm healing and using that to scream that SCH are "suffering" ... or the whopper liars that just go straight to claims that WHM x 2 is "better" than WHM+SCH... because they say so.

Some SCH want the legitimate issues fixed like pet UI... and some are just coming in here being deceptive to scream for buffs because they want to be OP.

[Valiant]

.

i will say it was done on Ultima we survived well enough.. some dd died due to idiocy in second phase.. (that dance is too simple) type 2 Ultima it wasnt needed since most aoe was easily avoidable. besides the cd caused by regen is the same as cure and if PoM is used right its easy to pop on alot of people real quick. Once again 1 regen heals more health than one cure.. you're a 50 CNJ go out and try it yourself and count each tick... regen heals more than cure 1 therefore a very useful spell to keep up health.. same goes for medica 2 than medica 1. pop medica 2's regen effect compared to medica 1 far more health will be restored.. the potency is per tick. If it wasn't per tick WHMs wouldn't be more useful than SCH.. and in 1.0 same method was used on van darnus.. 2.0 isnt much different than 1.0

[EmeraldSerenade]

Blah.

Before you continue to spout your nonsense, take 2 Scholars though Titan HM, then take 2 White Mages and tell me how perfectly fine Scholar is.

Yeah, Succor can -totally- save a group from stomps when he's near death.