let me rephrase, meaning sometimes gets lost in text.It's okay if you don't like it. That's your opinion and we respect that. But you can't say it's trailer when it's an opener and vice versa. If I had made a trailer when the studio wanted an opener or vice versa, I'd be (virtually) blackbarred from the industry. This is an opening movie, not a trailer. It doesn't pass for a trailer any more than kite passes for a plane.
i know its an opener, however to me it doesnt feel like one. It feels like a trailer because of the way its cut, thats all.
My point is, the cutting has nothing to do with it feeling, looking, passing, like a trailer. A trailer, like you said before needs narrative, summary, explanation and is usually, on average, 50~100% longer than a teaser (and usually takes longer and cost more to make), as I pointed out in post 189 on page 19 with the avenger trailer and teaser. Maybe what you mean is that it's not as fast pace as you would have liked it? Or as exciting? Maybe the pacing isn't as exciting or as fast or awe-inspiring as you would have liked it? (which is completely understandable. Adding the epilogue of 1.0 does drag the opening movie a bit. On the other hand, they needed to bring people back who aren't as up to speed as we are. There really was no perfect solution to that.) Because, often, trailers are a lot slower paced in general compared to the teaser (which is suppose to be "in-your-face" and fast paced.).
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.