Results 1 to 10 of 1807

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Colvin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    240
    Character
    Connor Colvin
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Shougun View Post
    They had hidden files for gay sex/relationship within most of the non gay sex games. Mass Effect 3 has it out right and visible however.
    I don't know what you mean by "non-gay sex games". However, the Mass Effect AND Dragon Age games definately pioneered the controversy. I think, however, they did it for the media exposure less than the acceptance. It certainly got the game all over the media for it. In the end, that is what makes adding the content a good decision.

    People need to stop approaching this from an impassioned personal stance and start seeing how you can logically justify the introduction of the feature on a cross-society, cross-ideology platform. If you can find the solution there, then you will have won the argument without having to justify it based on opinion alone.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    Arcell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    3,487
    Character
    Arc Jurado
    World
    Mateus
    Main Class
    Machinist Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Colvin View Post
    People need to stop approaching this from an impassioned personal stance and start seeing how you can logically justify the introduction of the feature on a cross-society, cross-ideology platform. If you can find the solution there, then you will have won the argument without having to justify it based on opinion alone.
    How does this sound? The introduction of a feature that binds two players in a way that is not explicitly romantic, is not called marriage and simply does not restrict player participation based on gender. I can't think of a reason to oppose a feature that isn't called marriage based on character genders.

    Edit: I mean the Valentione's Day event was more controversial than that because it was explicitly romantic. However no one made a big deal because it wasn't taking a stance on same sex anything. It simply didn't restrict player participation.
    (3)

  3. #3
    Player
    Colvin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    240
    Character
    Connor Colvin
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 50
    Quote Originally Posted by Arcell View Post
    How does this sound? The introduction of a feature that binds two players in a way that is not explicitly romantic, is not called marriage and simply does not restrict player participation based on gender. I can't think of a reason to oppose a feature that isn't called marriage based on character genders.

    Edit: I mean the Valentione's Day event was more controversial than that because it was explicitly romantic. However no one made a big deal because it wasn't taking a stance on same sex anything. It simply didn't restrict player participation.
    That's pretty much the solution that we have come back around to a few times. I think that is definately the best approach.
    (0)