Go back and reread your posts and count the times you claim your predictions are fact. If people aren't understanding your posts its because you aren't portraying your point accurately.

But really... the meat of the argument is that you believe prices will have a relative uptrend because of the redenomination. I wish there was a nicer way that I could explain how that is a very narrow view, but there really isn't. I concede that there is potential for your prediction to occur. I just don't think you understand how big of a scale the game economies have.

The point you keep trying to make is flawed because it depends on either a monopoly occurring or everyone else being kind of dim.

People will pay what they are willing to pay. That will always be true. For absolutely everyone in 2.0 to suddenly be willing to pay 2-5 times what they pay for items now is an incredibly slim chance. And of the numerous factors that go in to establishing what an item is worth at any given time, the price people ask for it is really one of the smallest. Because for any item worth selling and every person trying to sell it there will be atleast one more person trying to sell theirs first.

Some items may end up worth significantly more in 2.0 than they are in 1.0 But really... what will dictate that won't be the few gougers out there, it will be the demand for the item weighted by it's current supply.

And to finish up. In the medium of text, context is very hard to read. If you are reading my posts as overly hostile, that probably has more to do with you projecting that upon the text.

It's hard not to feel attacked when someone disagrees with you. I understand, sometimes I get carried away, too. But really the only points I've tried to make is mostly that your arguments are kinda on the weak side, and your predictions seem excessively pessimistic.