TGS Trailer ahoy!

[Punainen]

Really choppy gameplay?? Thats not a good sign when choppy gameplay is in the OFFICIAL trailer...

[Starlord]

Really choppy gameplay?? Thats not a good sign when choppy gameplay is in the OFFICIAL trailer...

People wanted PS3 Gameplay (that's is barely in Pre-Alpha state) well they got it. (Compared to Gamescom/PAX/Yoshi's Live letter, which had better graphics then the PS3 Version, I'm led to assume this is the PS3 Version.)

[Gramul]

People wanted PS3 Gameplay (that's is barely in Pre-Alpha state) well they got it. (Compared to Gamescom/PAX/Yoshi's Live letter, which had better graphics then the PS3 Version, I'm led to assume this is the PS3 Version.)

There's no reason to show the PS3 version. And if it was, that's really something you should label, so as not to get people into thinking that's the best the game can do.

[Anakhu]

There's no reason to show the PS3 version. And if it was, that's really something you should label, so as not to get people into thinking that's the best the game can do.

and why exactly is there no reason to show the ps3 version... you know console gamers far outweigh pc right?

[Gramul]

and why exactly is there no reason to show the ps3 version... you know console gamers far outweigh pc right?

Because there's virtually no point to showing them. It's the same game, but visually inferior. Why would you show off the visually inferior version in a trailer, something that hinges on providing visual information?

Why would it look great on all those other Screens/gameplay stuff, and now this trailer the graphics appear to be a step behind what we already saw before this?

That's what I want to know.

[Starlord]

Because there's virtually no point to showing them. It's the same game, but visually inferior. Why would you show off the visually inferior version in a trailer, something that hinges on providing visual information?



That's what I want to know.

It's best to know what the PS3 Users will be buying in terms of Quality. Quality will be different from PC to PS3.

[Gramul]

It's best to know what the PS3 Users will be buying in terms of Quality. Quality will be different from PC to PS3. (Well duh.)

What sort of multiplatform advertisement uses the weakest system to show off their game?

And is that why they didn't label it as the PS3 version? And if the PS3 version is so drastically early in development that they're experiencing heavy framerate, why make a shoddy trailer at all? Where the issues so bad that you had to include them to make a full trailer? Where there no other options?

[Anakhu]

Because there's virtually no point to showing them. It's the same game, but visually inferior. Why would you show off the visually inferior version in a trailer, something that hinges on providing visual information?



That's what I want to know.

really? k Mr. entitled

[Gramul]

really? k Mr. entitled

Entitled.

Entitled?

You. Think I'm entitled?

What a tragic notion.
What a lowly concept.
How weAk.

God forbid I bring critique. God forbid I point out problems. God forbid I try to help Square from making the same mistakes again.

Are they really that untouchable to you? Can they really not be shown their error? Is it that you fear to offend them? Are you afraid they'll just give up? Afraid they'll take the game from you? Don't want to hurt the feelings of the people we gave 2 years of time, money, and support to keep the project alive till it meets satisfaction?

Square releases a low quality trailer and pointing it that it's a bad decision makes me entitled? No. No it does not.

Not that it's an excuse, but isn't TGS the last "game related" convention until next year?

You know, this is actually a fairly good point. They have to release something at the show, being the last one before release, so they hastily scrap together a mundane trailer before the game is properly polished just to show progress for the TGS attendees. Not being one to hide such media, they release it for public viewing, and the game looks not so grand.

Honestly, this could all be avoided if they waited till it was ready to release it.

[Starlord]

There's no reason to show the PS3 version. And if it was, that's really something you should label, so as not to get people into thinking that's the best the game can do.

Well, there has been plenty of Screenshots/Gameplay ( with better quality) that has shown "the best they can do" Concept. However, we are still in Alpha on the PC ( were practically there now) and PS3 version is just a step behind the PC, not to mention the fact PS3 can only go up to 720p, which makes it all the worse.

Why would it look great on all those other Screens/gameplay stuff, and now this trailer the graphics appear to be a step behind what we already saw before this?