Reintroduce Maat in 2.0

[Rannie]

Honestly, I don't want to see Maat in the game. Second of all I tried fighting him after rdm got severly screwed over. And it wasn't because I wasn't a skilled player I lacked the right type of gear needed in the game like int and all that even though all my skills where capped so the gear I had wasn't great. I tried fighting him twice got beat twice. It's kind of hard to do the fight with the bind sleep nuke when bind didn't stick and so on and so forth.

(I did the best I can to try to beat him those two times and before I quit the game, I was doing everything I could to get the gear I needed to help boost my int. Hard to do with not enough money LOL)

[TatlTael]

I don't want Maat, but I'd love more 1 on 1 fights like Maat or like the solo ENM that was in Movalpolis. Maat himself can stay in FFXI.

[Firesped]

since this has been brought up. I personally don't think we should have the limit break quests with level increases in the game. I think Limit Break should be the Merit system for this game. If a level break quest is put in, I think it should be tied into Grand Company ranks.

[Ricky]

we need to stop the casuals from facerolling their way to lv50

I can't stand bad players as much as the next guy but why do we NEED to stop them? Laughable attitude

[Rau]

Also i would like to point out

you CAN NOT reintroduce something that was never implemented to begin with

therefore your thread title is full of tons of holes in itself

Can't tell if trolling, but despite how semantically incorrect the OP is, you(and most everyone who played XI) know what he means >_>

[Spy]

I already made this thread ;p

[Rannie]

o.O how does casual equate to being a bad player and what do you mean by facerolling their way to 50?

[Dragon]

Limit break quests should be introduced into XIV (starting at 50, though). Maat or no Maat.

People who want quest-based leveling should be the most supportive of this idea to begin with.

[Duelle]

Limit break quests should be introduced into XIV (starting at 50, though). Maat or no Maat.

People who want quest-based leveling should be the most supportive of this idea to begin with.

Quests for leveling and purposeful cockblocks are two very different things. The latter is not much different than attunement quests...well, except there's no logical backing to limit breaks other than giving you something to do for the sake of stopping your progression.

[Dragon]

Quests for leveling and purposeful cockblocks are two very different things. The latter is not much different than attunement quests...well, except there's no logical backing to limit breaks other than giving you something to do for the sake of stopping your progression.

That's your opinion.

Limit breaks can be implemented just as logical as any other type of quest, and even if they're not, they're still just as legitimate.