Youre caught up on language, and trying to police it. I don't really care what you are. If I misgendered you I am sorry. But im likely going to make that mistake in the future as I use him as just a default all compassing term. Like calling you "Bro". Doesn't really matter if youre male or female its kinda a all encompassing word.for like referring to "you" regardless of the gender, gender orientation, or gender identity.
But for your statement of the housing system is broken. If it works exactly how they're intending it to is it really broken? Again, 100% agree with you.They need to be more wards and increasing in items slots multiple layout and all those goodies.
But the way I see how it's going to get fixed is more top down. As imo i feel the apartment should be the entry level of housing. You give the plots the layout options, then increase the size of apt to small interior. You push the plots forward and increase the minimum standard for apts without infringing on the plots.
That would be an improvement to apt standards while still having the plots be more appealing. It is improving the system but in a different direction then your idea and doesnt require a system teardown. It's been clear to me for a very long time getting a plot is just another carrot on a stick that contains a hook built from your own investment in it.
This is just how the system seems presented as to me.
I'm not necessarily defending the system I'm asking you.Why would they want to change it?
Let's hypothetically say they did switch over to instanced. Do you not think there will be any ramifications for doing so? Venues might be a thing of the past, if everything's instance you're gonna need to find a way to locate somebodys plot. Will it be friends list limited? Do you have to be online for it to appear? I like waltzing in random people's plots from time to time and I cant do that in a instanced system. And id rather not lose that aspect. (Im defending the ward system here)
When its swapped over to instanced, you think they are just going to let the income evaporate? I think your idea is genuine and had good intentions. But the snorefest of a instance system that actually makes socialization events more difficult isnt something I want.
I'm not trying to stop you from getting a plot.Actually i'm trying to encourage you to get one. It's not gatekeeping, its enjoying a particular facet of having a neighborhood and a semi permanent location that is baked into the game. You feel apart of the game in a sense. And that is something that their hardware seems like it cant keep up with yet. But do I think the system should be scrapped because of that? No.
I see the sparks of what Yoshida was trying to do with my nearby fcs. But it's up to the players to make that work. The players need to have as much interest as those in this thread. However for the general playerbase, housing isnt as high on their priority list. The wards are an indication of that. A word for housing enthusiast , owners hangouts , and people who just like being there. The housing system would be lit!
But no, you end up with usually.Players who purchase these plots, decorate them, and move onto other content. And come back to maintain that investment until they don't.
So you have empty words but active players. Usually hanging out in limsa or the hubs. Which is why I say the housing wards situation is a reflection of player priority
If you really want to send him a message decorate whatever you can get your hands on. Don't say what you want show what you want. If apartments were maxed out, and decorated they couldnt ignore the message the players are sending. Rather then player requests may say one thing, but player activity towards it says another.