That's what throws me off about that. They're injecting their own definition of what housing is rather than take with the actual definition of housing is as a feature is. If you can decorate it it is considered housing whether you like it or not.
I'm saying this because I thought of this myself as a player when they implemented apartments. And the answer I came up with is technicality. Once they gave us apts. That was our "housing starter set" any "lack of housing" threads are toothless if apartments are available to purchase. That's just understanding the language.
But that language is intentional compassing Apts, smalls, medium, large. If you have access to one you have access to housing, and that right there disarms the "not enough housing" complaints.
They think im white knighting.. all they're doing is creating their own boogieman. They're hearing what they wanna hear not what i'm saying.
Earlier I mention that the ward system is a reflection of the player's priorities. I got no response to that. To be honest it seems like they're avoiding it. I like the word system but that is an unfortunate reality of it. The ward system needs the players to make it work. But the players don't want to spend the time in the ward or a isolated instance. But im the villain for pointing that out?
To be honest, I'm not surprised by some of it.I did say it was an entitlement issue and someone said it wasn't.Then proceeded to say we're entitled to it because we pay a sub....