Results -9 to 0 of 327

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Player
    Divinemights's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    2,143
    Character
    Altria Pendragons
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Ninja Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Solowing View Post
    That's what throws me off about that. They're injecting their own definition of what housing is rather than take with the actual definition of housing is as a feature is. If you can decorate it it is considered housing whether you like it or not.

    I'm saying this because I thought of this myself as a player when they implemented apartments. And the answer I came up with is technicality. Once they gave us apts. That was our "housing starter set" any "lack of housing" threads are toothless if apartments are available to purchase. That's just understanding the language.

    But that language is intentional compassing Apts, smalls, medium, large. If you have access to one you have access to housing, and that right there disarms the "not enough housing" complaints.

    They think im white knighting.. all they're doing is creating their own boogieman. They're hearing what they wanna hear not what i'm saying.

    Earlier I mention that the ward system is a reflection of the player's priorities. I got no response to that. To be honest it seems like they're avoiding it. I like the word system but that is an unfortunate reality of it. The ward system needs the players to make it work. But the players don't want to spend the time in the ward or a isolated instance. But im the villain for pointing that out?

    To be honest, I'm not surprised by some of it.I did say it was an entitlement issue and someone said it wasn't.Then proceeded to say we're entitled to it because we pay a sub....
    This is a textbook case of failed equivocation.
    My first post clearly stated that there doesn’t seem to be a housing crisis: most small plots remain unbid even a year after the demolition lock.
    This is supported by solid evidence and directly addresses the topic.
    Instead of engaging with that, this person twists the argument, claiming I’m “forcing everyone to bid on small plots.”
    That’s a complete misrepresentation.
    Their attempt to switch concepts is poorly executed and baseless and everything actually points back to their own flawed reasoning.

    As for the “White Knight” label, don’t take it seriously.
    It’s a last-resort tactic when someone is losing an argument.
    Even if your perspective is neutral and reasonable, if it doesn’t fit their narrative and they lack evidence, they’ll resort to personal labels instead of addressing your points.
    (0)
    Last edited by Divinemights; 08-16-2025 at 04:02 PM.