The tank doesn't need to say anything because this game has active battle logging anyway. It'll be obvious if the GM reviews them, and that is that.
The tank doesn't need to say anything because this game has active battle logging anyway. It'll be obvious if the GM reviews them, and that is that.
It's a lot more fun when some of these "You Pull, You Tank" heads are writing out the report for you in chat. Do these idiots not know it's an actionable offence?
Let that sink in while a GM throws them in the time-out chair in GM jail.
Your first problem is not having a point in time to reference an alleged incident ever happening. For all you can confirm, I have been speaking hypothetically the entire time. That's why I can be smug about it and you can pretend to maintain a moral high ground to justify Ad Hominem attacking others. This isn't some kind of goofy edgy 4D chess big brain play here at all. Discover Occam's Razor.
You're just scratching the surface of something about making assumptions. It's 100% "sometimes I can't grab everything in time".
Wink wonk.
If the tank isn't pulling more, there's a reason for it. The correct solution is asking them why to resolve that, instead of potentially catching 5 casts of Unfinal Sting trying to bring everything into the AOE blender because..... what happened again? Oh right. You made an assumption.
So the defense is “it was all hypothetical” — convenient. Nothing like retroactively slapping a thought-experiment label on your own words once they get called out. Occam’s Razor here isn’t that you’re playing 4D chess; it’s that you said exactly what you meant, and now you’re backpedaling under the safety of hypotheticals.Your first problem is not having a point in time to reference an alleged incident ever happening. For all you can confirm, I have been speaking hypothetically the entire time. That's why I can be smug about it and you can pretend to maintain a moral high ground to justify Ad Hominem attacking others. This isn't some kind of goofy edgy 4D chess big brain play here at all. Discover Occam's Razor.
And if pointing that out is “ad hominem,” then maybe the real problem isn’t my moral high ground — Calling out contradictions isn’t ad hominem — it’s just me putting a mirror up. If you don’t like the reflection, that’s not my fallacy.
“Wink wonk” is cute, but it doesn’t cover the fact that your stance has been moonwalking all over this thread. First, it was “let them die,” then “it’s hypothetical,” now it’s “actually, you’re just assuming.”You're just scratching the surface of something about making assumptions. It's 100% "sometimes, I can't grab everything in time".
Wink wonk.
If the tank isn't pulling more, there's a reason for it. The correct solution is asking them why to resolve that, instead of potentially catching 5 casts of Unfinal Sting trying to bring everything into the AOE blender because..... what happened again? Oh right. You made an assumption.
Nobody’s saying tanks never miss a grab — that happens to all of us. The problem was that you dressed it up, letting DPS faceplant, as some enlightened philosophy instead of just being late on a pull. That wasn’t an assumption; again, those were your own words.
If you’ve finally settled on “sometimes I miss stuff,” then hey — welcome to the same reality the rest of us were already living in. Congrats on catching up, champ.
Glad we cleared that up. Took a while, but we got there. That’s enough backflips for me. You can keep rewriting your stance; I’ll stick to playing the game.
Last edited by MaikoRaines; 08-17-2025 at 02:43 PM. Reason: "Did you learn those big words all by yourself?"
This sounds like a whole lot of not my problem. Why does your class say Archer at level 100? Can we talk about that?So the defense is “it was all hypothetical” — convenient. Nothing like retroactively slapping a thought-experiment label on your own words once they get called out. Occam’s Razor here isn’t that you’re playing 4D chess; it’s that you said exactly what you meant, and now you’re backpedaling under the safety of hypotheticals.
And if pointing that out is “ad hominem,” then maybe the real problem isn’t my moral high ground — Calling out contradictions isn’t ad hominem — it’s just me putting a mirror up. If you don’t like the reflection, that’s not my fallacy.
“Wink wonk” is cute, but it doesn’t cover the fact that your stance has been moonwalking all over this thread. First, it was “let them die,” then “it’s hypothetical,” now it’s “actually, you’re just assuming.”
Nobody’s saying tanks never miss a grab — that happens to all of us. The problem was that you dressed it up, letting DPS faceplant, as some enlightened philosophy instead of just being late on a pull. That wasn’t an assumption; again, those were your own words.
If you’ve finally settled on “sometimes I miss stuff,” then hey — welcome to the same reality the rest of us were already living in. Congrats on catching up, champ.
Glad we cleared that up. Took a while, but we got there. That’s enough backflips for me. You can keep rewriting your stance; I’ll stick to playing the game.
Going from Occam’s Razor to “lol Archer” is certainly… a journey. Gas tank running on empty now? Glad you enjoyed the detour more than the discussion.
Don’t worry about my class tag — it’s still pulling more weight than your tanking and your argument.
i think they're just baiting at this point
Last edited by theunhappypotato; 08-18-2025 at 03:19 AM. Reason: english is hard
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.