Quote Originally Posted by Supersnow845 View Post
I didn’t say with any authority what they did cut. I’m saying based on what we have from EW stretching EW’s current plotlines across 2 expansions wouldn’t work. Sure they probably cut a lot of potential plotlines but we don’t know the quality of those cut plotlines, they could have been fantastic or they could have been awful. We see EW as rushed now, who’s to say that if they gave it two expansions we wouldn’t see it as a slow bloated mess after the fast and tight ShB?

The only thing I speculated on was how popular a garlemald focused expansion would have been if it took a similar tone to the time we did spend in garlemald

I for one didn’t see enough I liked in EW to think they could pull that across 2 expansions but that’s entirely my opinion
Yeah, if you went with that logic sure, stretching the current EW over two expansions wouldn't work. EW was a bloated fastpaced mess, how many nations and areas did we visit again? THavnair deserved more, Garlemald definitely deserved more.
We are left with speculation but it would've been their job to make more areas for Garlemald. I for one would've probably focused on Thavnair and Garlemald in one expansion, deleting the whole of Labyrinthos and their spaceship.(because it makes no sense)
And made us care for both nations more (at least the good parts of Garlemald) while the patches would hype up the Final Days sorting out the world going crazy and hyping up the mystery until the whole world unravels in 7.0 and we need to fix it.. insert Elpis and Sharlayan.