Results -9 to 0 of 90

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Player
    Supersnow845's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    6,613
    Character
    Andreas Cestelle
    World
    Jenova
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Hallarem View Post
    Yeah, if you went with that logic sure, stretching the current EW over two expansions wouldn't work. EW was a bloated fastpaced mess, how many nations and areas did we visit again? THavnair deserved more, Garlemald definitely deserved more.
    We are left with speculation but it would've been their job to make more areas for Garlemald. I for one would've probably focused on Thavnair and Garlemald in one expansion, deleting the whole of Labyrinthos and their spaceship.(because it makes no sense)
    And made us care for both nations more (at least the good parts of Garlemald) while the patches would hype up the Final Days sorting out the world going crazy and hyping up the mystery until the whole world unravels in 7.0 and we need to fix it.. insert Elpis and Sharlayan.
    I could see that working but again I’m not sure, I mean garlemald as a sympathetic nation never really resonated with me (entirely personal opinion) so in my mind I’d struggle to be engaged with a garlemald + thavnir + maybe corvos expansion as an example which was kinda the original point I was making I might just have sounded authoritative than I meant to sound

    Quote Originally Posted by Auro_Seldaris View Post
    I would have rather had whatever they had planned for Garlemald Expansion and then Endwalker, than what we got for Dawntrail.

    Sorry, you can't convince me that finishing the storyline in an organic , logical fashion is a worse idea than rushing it to get to... Dawntrail.

    Hell, somewhere out there is an alternate universe where we got Westwolves instead of Dawntrail, I'd rather have taken a gamble on that.
    Dawntrail’s quality doesn’t factor into the conversation because this is about short EW vs long EW. Your belief that they rushed EW specifically to reach DT has no foundation, the interview specifically said they sped up EW, not they did it because they wanted to tell DT

    I’m simply saying from my perspective nothing in EW’s plot threads engaged me enough to keep it going for two expansions, that point is entirely seperate to whether I think a hypothetical 2 expansion EW is better than DT (even ignoring it might still be followed by DT anyway)
    (0)
    Last edited by Supersnow845; 07-30-2025 at 01:13 AM.
    As a healer main in this game for nigh on 14 years all I can say is that I’m tired. My role has been eroded of complexity and expression for 3 expansions. I’ve watched the tanks do my role for me for 2 expansions and my feedback and critiques continue to fall on deaf ears.

    I have no idea who modern healers are designed for but I know now it’s not me. This is the first expansion I’m truly considering dropping the healer role and not returning, so if that was the goal- congratulations I guess