Translation Corner

[Kaedan]

The sole fact that you state the division is even near to 50/50 shows me that you're reading quite selectively, ergo your summary seems quite biased to me.

Mind you, people aren't split 50/50 even here, so the selectiveness is even more evident.

A) Tell me where I said they are split 50/50 in the OP on this thread. Oh that's right... I didn't.
B) If people aren't split 50/50 on the issue, then give us a number. You claim to know that it isn't split 50/50, so since you've obviously counted up every unique post you can tell us how many people are for and against a penalty.

Slander? I simply gave people a tool to read by themselves.
You say "trust me!"
I say "trust your own eyes".

It's that simple.

You accused me of lying. You accused me of making false statements to further my own agenda. I did nothing of the sort. That is slander (possibly libel in this case, since it's written).

Get a room you two

I think its a great thread, we all are curious about the feedback, so cool down guys.

I'm not the one telling lies about him and I had to defend myself from his hateful, false accusations.

[Abriael]

A) Tell me where I said they are split 50/50 in the OP on this thread. Oh that's right... I didn't.
B) If people aren't split 50/50 on the issue, then give us a number. You claim to know that it isn't split 50/50, so since you've obviously counted up every unique post you can tell us how many people are for and against a penalty.

You told it in quite a few occasions in other threads, and this one you made quite an active effort to make the posters look very much split on the issue.

I would say less than 10% of the posters are arguing in favor of an experience-based penalty.
That's not having "a lot of people on both sides", that's having a few people overwhelmed by the majority.

You accused me of lying. You accused me of making false statements to further my own agenda. I did nothing of the sort. That is slander (possibly libel in this case, since it's written).

First of all, there's quite a difference between lying and being biased. And considering how spitefully aggressive you've been about this issue (and even here, mind you), yes, you are biased.
I might be too, that's why I encouraged people to look for themselves.

I'm not the one telling lies about him and I had to defend myself from his hateful, false accusations.

Hyperbole much?
Should I quote some of your spiteful responses in other threads? Maybe you should think about how you post yourself before accusing others to "hate" you

And Kaedan is right, in this case. He freely invited anyone to post, which hardly makes him sound like he's trying to be a lone hero. Plus, if you have used the google translator, you should know the translation it gives is hardly understandable by a fledgling Japanese student, much less someone with no idea. I look up stuff sometimes, but I don't have the time to struggle with every post with my beginner skills. Help from anybody with translation is appreciated from me.

Unfortunately with the way people are in this forum, radically biased towards their opinion, I would strongly discourage believing anything but your own eyes on this kind of reporting. Even if you can grasp only the general meaning of a post, it'll still be more complete and precise than having someone summarize a whole thread for you in a few lines. You're entirely free to chose the option you prefer too. I gave an alternative that I find more effective and unbiased.