WoW's player housing will have no FOMO and private housing wards

[Hanayumi]

Ngl still think they should nuke Island Sanctuary and use that server space for instance housing.

[Absurdity]

Ngl still think they should nuke Island Sanctuary and use that server space for instance housing.

That would do nothing because there isn't any "new" space. IS just runs on the same servers and uses the same capacity as the house interior, which is why you couldn't even enter your house for some hours when Island Sanctuary released.

-Remove all but one house from people who already own multiple on one acccount/character.

This is the big one.
I don't care if you bought your 30 housing plots legitimately when that was still possible, it was clearly a gross design oversight and nobody "needs" to have an entire ward to themselves, that's just ridiculous.
Make them choose one plot out of all they own, give them back the gil they paid for the rest and clear those plots.


Is it going to solve the issue? Of course not, but just letting people get away with that kind of nonsense is really not inspiring confidence.

[Clockworks]

That would do nothing because there isn't any "new" space. IS just runs on the same servers and uses the same capacity as the house interior, which is why you couldn't even enter your house for some hours when Island Sanctuary released.



This is the big one.
I don't care if you bought your 30 housing plots legitimately when that was still possible, it was clearly a gross design oversight and nobody "needs" to have an entire ward to themselves, that's just ridiculous.
Make them choose one plot out of all they own, give them back the gil they paid for the rest and clear those plots.


Is it going to solve the issue? Of course not, but just letting people get away with that kind of nonsense is really not inspiring confidence.

Okay, lets say they did remove the houses from multiowners, you admitted yourself it wont solve the issue which at least is good.

My question is, who are you going to come after next after multiowners since it will fix absolutely nothing ? Or are you just happy removing the houses multiowners worked for (more than any person that is not a multiowner, you can believe it or not, doesnt matter, they did work on it far more than people with a single house)

I ask that question because from what I'm reading, you are more than happy with their houses getting destroyed knowing very well it wont fix anything, you dont want a solution or for people to have houses, you just want SE to take the houses multiowners worked on. That's called envy and jealousy.

[Arohk]

I ask that question because from what I'm reading, you are more than happy with their houses getting destroyed knowing very well it wont fix anything, you dont want a solution or for people to have houses, you just want SE to take the houses multiowners worked on. That's called envy and jealousy.

First of all, the current rules of the game allows a player to only buy one house, this would just enforce the current rules, leave them one of their largest houses and demolish the rest.

I have a large house myself and it took me very long to get one, yes it wouldn't fix what you guys see as a "Problem", but the housing areas are very limited and if one players has 20 houses they can probably can't even use it is just unfair for the other 19 people who cant have one.
Do you really think someone can decorate 20 homes and does that regularly? most people who have a house decorate them once and then never again.
There is already a big housing crisis in real life because billionaires own and speculate on real estate, we don't need that in a video game too.

Instanced housing could easily be implemented by using the apartment system and allowing players to increase the interior size, i am not against that.

[Clockworks]

First of all, the current rules of the game allows a player to only buy one house, this would just enforce the current rules, leave them one of their largest houses and demolish the rest.

I have a large house myself and it took me very long to get one, yes it wouldn't fix what you guys see as a "Problem", but the housing areas are very limited and if one players has 20 houses they can probably can't even use it is just unfair for the other 19 people who cant have one.
Do you really think someone can decorate 20 homes and does that regularly? most people who have a house decorate them once and then never again.
There is already a big housing crisis in real life because billionaires own and speculate on real estate, we don't need that in a video game too.

Instanced housing could easily be implemented by using the apartment system and allowing players to increase the interior size, i am not against that.

Thank you but that was not my question, my question was : Who will people (and the person I quoted included) go after in the case multiowners lost their houses ? Since it wont fix anything, who is next in line to have to lose their house ?

[Arohk]

Thank you but that was not my question, my question was : Who will people (and the person I quoted included) go after in the case multiowners lost their houses ? Since it wont fix anything, who is next in line to have to lose their house ?

What is your problem exactly? i already made a suggestion.
It is obvious that in this current structure not every player can own a house in an open area, and that is fine.
Opening blocked slot for new players is a good idea regardless if it solves what ever your problem is or not.

i really don't like this mindset of "this wont fix the(my) issue, so lets do nothing"
Instead of beign envious, you could try and make friends in the game and share a house with someone

[Clockworks]

What is your problem exactly? i already made a suggestion.
It is obvious that in this current structure not every player can own a house in an open area, and that is fine.
Opening blocked slot for new players is a good idea regardless if it solves what ever your problem is or not.

i really don't like this mindset of "this wont fix the(my) issue, so lets do nothing"
Instead of beign envious, you could try and make friends in the game and share a house with someone

"What is my problem", I dont have a problem, I simply asked a question, I personally dont have any problem, I am confused as to what you're on about ? What am I envious of ?

[Reinha]

I don't care if you bought your 30 housing plots legitimately when that was still possible, it was clearly a gross design oversight and nobody "needs" to have an entire ward to themselves, that's just ridiculous.

It is still possible. The conditions to buy a house are literally outlined in the official square enix housing guide and you can follow it to the letter to become a multiowner.