Housing Interior Size Upgrade

[Canadane]

Video Mao saw said that if buy small, will probably has to pay cost of large to upsgrade interior.

I'm okay with this.

[Canadane]

Why are you talking like a 5 year old?

Mao is a treasure.

[Titor]

Mao is feral Au Ra raised by Dragon Momma whats adopted Mao. Mao nots know Eorzean speakings very well. On other claw, Mao knows Dragon speakings very well.

Except a dragon speaker should know that personal pronouns are a part of the dragon language, and that the Eorzean counterpart would not really refer to themselves in third person, but instead use first person "I", as that is not a dragon convention, and anyone teaching Eorzean language (or any immersion language, reading, etc) would not encourage the use of speaking in third person.

From the dragonspeak lore post
"Speaking of sentence subjects, whereas English employs several types of pronouns, dragonspeak has only the following three:

1st person = a[n] (covers: we and I)
2nd & 3rd person = i[n] (covers you, he, she, they)
3rd person inanimate = a[h] (covers it, that, this, those)"

And
"Possessive pronouns are no different from the pronouns listed above:

My/Our vengeance - a[n] sja[h]s
Your/His/Her/Their vengeance - i[n] sja[h]s
Its vengeance - a[h] sja[h]s"

Which show that dragons refer to themselves as "I/We/Our" and not by their names.

It is also unlikely for a dragon, or one raised by dragons, to be considered feral, given the high intellect of the dragons.



More on topic- I am really looking forward to this interior change.

[Eraden]

Except a dragon speaker should know that personal pronouns are a part of the dragon language, and that the Eorzean counterpart would not really refer to themselves in third person, but instead use first person "I", as that is not a dragon convention, and anyone teaching Eorzean language (or any immersion language, reading, etc) would not encourage the use of speaking in third person.

From the dragonspeak lore post
"Speaking of sentence subjects, whereas English employs several types of pronouns, dragonspeak has only the following three:

1st person = a[n] (covers: we and I)
2nd & 3rd person = i[n] (covers you, he, she, they)
3rd person inanimate = a[h] (covers it, that, this, those)"

And
"Possessive pronouns are no different from the pronouns listed above:

My/Our vengeance - a[n] sja[h]s
Your/His/Her/Their vengeance - i[n] sja[h]s
Its vengeance - a[h] sja[h]s"

Which show that dragons refer to themselves as "I/We/Our" and not by their names.

It is also unlikely for a dragon, or one raised by dragons, to be considered feral, given the high intellect of the dragons.



More on topic- I am really looking forward to this interior change.

NOPES! Is nots what Mao Momma taught Mao. Mao Momma always called Mao, Mao (is slightly differents in Dragon speakings). Also, Mao Momma and Family lived in cave and eats meats whats Mao Momma and Mao Big Brother catches. Can be smarts and feral at same time. When Mao livings with Mao Momma, Mao would has to fights with the younger hatchlings for meats. Mao would usually lose buts then Mao big Brother would share meats with Mao.

[SentinelBasch]

It's nice to see when a game has a good lore, and when players contribute to it by getting into character.

It's not everything of course, but it does help with immersion. I used to play Everquest II and remember being turned off when they added orc rodeos.

[Titor]

NOPES! Is nots what Mao Momma taught Mao. Mao Momma always called Mao, Mao (is slightly differents in Dragon speakings). Also, Mao Momma and Family lived in cave and eats meats whats Mao Momma and Mao Big Brother catches. Can be smarts and feral at same time. When Mao livings with Mao Momma, Mao would has to fights with the younger hatchlings for meats. Mao would usually lose buts then Mao big Brother would share meats with Mao.

Nope, I think it was spriggans not dragons

[Impia]

Nope, I think it was spriggans not dragons

Meh, same thing.

[Carin-Eri]

Except a dragon speaker should know that personal pronouns are a part of the dragon language, and that the Eorzean counterpart would not really refer to themselves in third person, but instead use first person "I", as that is not a dragon convention, and anyone teaching Eorzean language (or any immersion language, reading, etc) would not encourage the use of speaking in third person.

From the dragonspeak lore post
"Speaking of sentence subjects, whereas English employs several types of pronouns, dragonspeak has only the following three:

1st person = a[n] (covers: we and I)
2nd & 3rd person = i[n] (covers you, he, she, they)
3rd person inanimate = a[h] (covers it, that, this, those)"

And
"Possessive pronouns are no different from the pronouns listed above:

My/Our vengeance - a[n] sja[h]s
Your/His/Her/Their vengeance - i[n] sja[h]s
Its vengeance - a[h] sja[h]s"

Which show that dragons refer to themselves as "I/We/Our" and not by their names.

It is also unlikely for a dragon, or one raised by dragons, to be considered feral, given the high intellect of the dragons.



More on topic- I am really looking forward to this interior change.

Meh - as has been noted, Mao is an absolute treasure and should be left to what they do as only they can

[Khryseis_Astra]

I still stand by my suspicion that that the size increase inside will be considered "item limit increase"*

*Unless you own a large.

From the Live Letter digest they release this morning:
“Another update, which is currently under consideration, would allow players to expand the interior size of their estate; for example, a Small estate could have a Large-size interior. This change too, would hopefully allow players to enjoy decorating their estates more freely. In our current concept, expanding the interior will require gil. We do not have an implementation schedule for this feature yet, so please look forward to hearing about our progress in the future.

Finally, as we’ve previously announced, we are currently working to increase the maximum number of furnishings that can be placed in an estate. We expect it to be ready by Patch 7.2 or 7.3, so please look forward to it!”

So it’s the item limit increase that is coming in 7.2/3 and not the interior size changes, which doesn’t “have an implementation schedule” yet. From most translations I’d seen, I thought the interior size was what was coming in “one or two patches” and they didn’t mention item limits at all. But it looks like we’re getting the item limits first, so those will be a separate thing.

[Rinoa_353]

From the Live Letter digest they release this morning:
“Another update, which is currently under consideration, would allow players to expand the interior size of their estate; for example, a Small estate could have a Large-size interior. This change too, would hopefully allow players to enjoy decorating their estates more freely. In our current concept, expanding the interior will require gil. We do not have an implementation schedule for this feature yet, so please look forward to hearing about our progress in the future.

Finally, as we’ve previously announced, we are currently working to increase the maximum number of furnishings that can be placed in an estate. We expect it to be ready by Patch 7.2 or 7.3, so please look forward to it!”

So it’s the item limit increase that is coming in 7.2/3 and not the interior size changes, which doesn’t “have an implementation schedule” yet. From most translations I’d seen, I thought the interior size was what was coming in “one or two patches” and they didn’t mention item limits at all. But it looks like we’re getting the item limits first, so those will be a separate thing.

I really hope that's the case since mansions desperately need at least 200 more slots to use all three floors which is what I want to do when I renovate the interiors of both my mansions when the item limit increases. Since the interior expansion is still not set in stone, I think it'll probably come with the final patches of DT or at the latest 8.0 if they don't have it planned to release now.