Results 1 to 10 of 149

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    3,208
    Quote Originally Posted by Starlord View Post
    But half the Server will surely be at those Hamlets + How many NPCs will be fighting with you +How many Beastman will be attending the fight= not pretty for the server.. even if it were to possible.. it wouldn't be playable because of the massive lag.
    5-10 npcs 15 players 10 mobs at a time(really hard to kill) they could have made it worked
    (1)

  2. #2
    Player
    Starlord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    7,180
    Character
    Luna Sushima
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Samurai Lv 91
    Quote Originally Posted by Rokien View Post
    5-10 npcs 15 players 10 mobs at a time(really hard to kill) they could have made it worked
    #1 You don't have a clue how many people will play Hamlets unless your psychic, and also the first week, especially the first day everyone is going to WANT to try out this new content.. so your going to figure 200+ people going to be at the Hamlets doorstep wanting to try out it's content. So no this would not be able to work on a first week post 1.22 Basis! ( and this is all on based that you want this content Non-Instanced)

    #2 You don't know how many NPC will be participating in the Hamlets (the Screenshot that says " Militia Survivors" says 10, that means there could very well be more then 10 NPC, since you have to keep them alive also)

    #3 You don;t know how many Monsters are going to be popping out at once ( First wave 25 weak Pawns Second wave 15 mid-hard mobs, third wave 10 Hard mobs) we don;t even know whats in store with any of this.

    But one thing is for certain though... you cannot sit here and tell me that only 15 players are going to show up at the Hamlets Defense..

    and besides 8 ppl + 10 or more NPCs and 10+mobs at a time isn't much of a difference as 15 ppl + 10 or more NPCs and 10+mobs at a time... there isn't really much of a difference if that's what you are implying.
    (2)