The new Viper changes are great

[W00by]

I didn't insinuate you were wrong to like it. I've said many times in many of my posts that anyone who feels how they feel about anything -- positionals, job complexity, fight design -- is entitled to how they feel.

But my stance is that current Viper is OBJECTIVELY poorly designed in comparison to the previous Viper. You can find it fun, but you're saying they're good changes with no evidence of them being good changes other than "I like them" which is awful evidence. I mention the logs to demonstrate that whether or not you like it is feeling based, not based on anything objective or substantial because you're unskilled and not even playing the job in the content where job design matters, and that you calling for EVEN MORE ACCESSIBILITY is just ridiculous. I have to show that you're being ridiculous somehow, because I can't argue against your feelings, now, can I?

If you want to argue against my objective takes on why current Viper is bad, you're free to do so. They're all in my profile. But you know what? I admit to it being a little bit of spite. Players like you love to dance on the grave of complexity and call for it to get even worse because you hate "toxic" players like me, just look at how your first post is worded. Why would you have even made this thread instead of responding to one of the current megathreads -- like the one I made -- if you weren't having a little jab at people who are upset? And players like you will read the more objective posts I DO make (I've made plenty) and call me a toxic elitist because of that, or say I have no ground to stand on. There's no point talking to you. You'll call me toxic or dismiss what it is I have to say because, historically, you always get what you want. Every job gets to be made for you And players like me are tired of it and like taking the piss out of people like you.

Anyway, I've had a decent time making you look silly, so I'm not replying to this thread anymore. Should've taken my own advice and ignored you outright, but I have to admit it was a little fun.

Everything you said was proven untrue in my first post. You can't prove something via lack of evidence. Like that's just not how it works.

That said, I do have proof through your own methods. you just can't cherrypick the bad while ignoring the good.

To the other person: Post it then! The video preferably, that'd be cool to see. Maybe you're super good, who knows. Preferably a Viper vod since that's what these conversations have been about!

(Also, by the logic that you can't prove something via lack of evidence, then I can't prove that Bigfoot isn't real -- I also can't prove that Unicorns don't exist -- I also can't prove that dragons don't exist -- that's a really silly argument, you can definitely make assumptions about something based on a lack of evidence, i.e. there's no evidence you're good = therefore it's possible you aren't good, likely even. but maybe bigfoot is real who knows)