Lyse vs. Wuk Lamat

[Nadda]

They called people criticizing circus clowns and having issues with themselves.
They said people skipped cutscenes if they hate the story.
Do you really want to defend that?
I said time and time again that I don‘t have a problem with others liking the story but if you go down to personal attacks no matter the side then you lose the argument and there is no defending.

Explain please how I have coming for me what exactly?
Did I personally attack anyone of you? Did I forbid you from posting your opinion?
Did I ever call someone liking the story out in any form?

Such behavior is not acceptable!

I understand your frustration, and I agree that personal attacks are not acceptable. It's important to maintain a respectful tone in our discussions.

The comment you mentioned was indeed inappropriate, and defending it isn't my intention. I was trying to point out that sometimes people react harshly when they feel attacked or when the overall tone of the conversation is very negative. It's a reminder for all of us to be mindful of our words and strive for empathy, even when we disagree strongly.

You haven't personally attacked anyone, and I appreciate that. However, I do feel by singling that person out you were being dismissive of their feelings and humiliating them. My main point was about fostering a more civil environment for everyone involved. We can all benefit from taking a step back and considering how our words affect others. If being respectful is your true purpose surely you understand this.

Let's focus on discussing the content of the story and sharing our perspectives without resorting to personal attacks. By doing so, we can have a more productive and respectful conversation.

Lastly, be relieved I don't consider you my personal editor and will continue to speak freely.

Ask for continuing this quarrel I have no intention of doing so.

[Voidmage]

I understand your frustration, and I agree that personal attacks are not acceptable. It's important to maintain a respectful tone in our discussions.

The comment you mentioned was indeed inappropriate, and defending it isn't my intention. I was trying to point out that sometimes people react harshly when they feel attacked or when the overall tone of the conversation is very negative. It's a reminder for all of us to be mindful of our words and strive for empathy, even when we disagree strongly.

You haven't personally attacked anyone, and I appreciate that. However, I do feel by singling that person out you were being dismissive of their feelings and humiliating them. My main point was about fostering a more civil environment for everyone involved. We can all benefit from taking a step back and considering how our words affect others. If being respectful is your true purpose surely you understand this.

Let's focus on discussing the content of the story and sharing our perspectives without resorting to personal attacks. By doing so, we can have a more productive and respectful conversation.

Lastly, be relieved I don't consider you my personal editor and will continue to speak freely.

Ask for continuing this quarrel I have no intention of doing so.

Ok then. It seems we are of the same mind then even though I don't agree on me sdismissing their feelings but I won't comment further on that.