Consumable arrows

[Coglin]

Goldsmiths make pretty much all the jewelry in the game and carpenters make a lot of weapons. Besides they could still make arrows just the non-consumable quiver version which would be prolly more expensive to make and buy but wouldn't be consumed.

Dunno about stuff for DoH and DoL to make dictating how a class should be. Also I imagine carpenters will have a lot more relevance once we finally get housing with actual furniture.

I love seeing folks with classes at level 0, explain how those who have then at level 50 are wrong in what they say about them or how something will effect them.

Anyway, they are phasing alot the goldsmith portion of the arrowns out anyway, they are making the new arrows in a manner that the arrow head comes from blacksmith now instead of goldsmith. Now GDS/BLS share responsobility for the making of materials for arrow heads. Arrowheads ae a simple recipe, and fill level gaps. Thus, they are a staple for leveling the classes at points. Whatthat has todowith thre making of jewelry and weapons I will never know.

All I know is I can see it effecting 3 DoH and 2 DoL all of which I have leveled to some extent and one or so I haveapped. So I find it interesting that a poster having those same classes at 0 debating it.

All that being said, from the perspective of bard being my main, I am for the non-consumables idea.

[Wevlum]

I love seeing folks with classes at level 0, explain how those who have then at level 50 are wrong in what they say about them or how something will effect them.

Anyway, they are phasing alot the goldsmith portion of the arrowns out anyway, they are making the new arrows in a manner that the arrow head comes from blacksmith now instead of goldsmith. Now GDS/BLS share responsobility for the making of materials for arrow heads. Arrowheads ae a simple recipe, and fill level gaps. Thus, they are a staple for leveling the classes at points. Whatthat has todowith thre making of jewelry and weapons I will never know.

All I know is I can see it effecting 3 DoH and 2 DoL all of which I have leveled to some extent and one or so I haveapped. So I find it interesting that a poster having those same classes at 0 debating it.

All that being said, from the perspective of bard being my main, I am for the non-consumables idea.

...So unless I have them at 50 I'm not allowed to talk about them, K

[Teia]

I love seeing folks with classes at level 0, explain how those who have then at level 50 are wrong in what they say about them or how something will effect them.

Says someone whose BTN is 31, whose CRP is 23, and whose BSM is only 13. Please, continue to explain through your vast personal experience just how these issues affect people with the relevant classes at 50.

[Coglin]

...So unless I have them at 50 I'm not allowed to talk about them, K

Nope. Just referencing that if you making jewelry is all that GLS isabout you clearly are clueless about the class. I explained to you how it would be effected by the change bassed on my experience and you posted some off kilter opinion. I never said you can't post about anything. Your simply trying to put word in my mouth for what reason? Just because I posted a slight disagreeance?

Says someone whose BTN is 31, whose CRP is 23, and whose BSM is only 13. Please, continue to explain through your vast personal experience just how these issues affect people with the relevant classes at 50.

Whats that got to do with a conversation about GLS there genious? Is 31/23/13 not higher then 0? Oh wait, that doesn't matter because GLS was being discussed, and the effects of removing recipies to it. Had you actually read the thread, and wern't just trolling it, you might no this. Had you not been purely trolling it, perhaps you would have actually added something to the conversation.

[Teia]

Whats that got to do with a conversation about GLS there genious? Is 31/23/13 not higher then 0? Oh wait, that doesn't matter because GLS was being discussed, and the effects of removing recipies to it. Had you actually read the thread, and wern't just trolling it, you might no this. Had you not been purely trolling it, perhaps you would have actually added something to the conversation.

Wut, I say wut, boy:

... Now GDS/BLS share responsobility for the making of materials for arrow heads. ...
All I know is I can see it effecting 3 DoH and 2 DoL all of which I have leveled to some extent and one or so I haveapped. So I find it interesting that a poster having those same classes at 0 debating it.

Its tough to change it at this point though. Arrows are a staple of leveling for goldsmiths and woodworkers. Who are in turn utilizing materials from botonist and miners. Removing consumable arrows would not nessiccerily be detrimental to the economy, but it certainly would be an annoying complication for some time to DoL/H for a good while.

So if you were only discussing GSM, what's all this talk about stuff that isn't GSM?

[Coglin]

So if you were only discussing GSM, what's all this talk about stuff that isn't GSM?

this makes my point exactly. If you have to ask this question you have no business being part of the conversation.

[Arcell]

this makes my point exactly. If you have to ask this question you have no business being part of the conversation.

Well as Findel said, arrowheads aren't even used in arrows anymore. If you're talking about dated recipes, they'll be gone soon enough anyway so that's kind of a non-issue.

[Coglin]

Well as Findel said, arrowheads aren't even used in arrows anymore. If you're talking about dated recipes, they'll be gone soon enough anyway so that's kind of a non-issue.

They still make the items that replaced arrow heads in the recipe. That seems very related to me.