Genderlocked gear. Again.

[Rudje]

Attitude? I think I'm being misunderstood here. I like androgynous styles on both genders, I merely stated that one should have the option and not being forced to either wearing genderless attire or something too feminine on a male character who's supposed to... well, look the part. No gender difference would mean there's no obvious "girly" or "manly" vibe - which many enjoy and have fun dressing their characters in - and every clothing design would have to be toned down to something flat and shapeless. And even if not, it will always lean more towards one of two possible directions, which, in turn, would result in too many people being dissatisfied depending on personal tastes and preferences.

I understand your wish but the solution can't be to exclude others in order to include one's own self. Unlocking both versions for each seems to be the a reasonable approach, though.

Insisting that they would "have" to do that is part of the very attitude I'm talking about. There are plenty of items wearable by both model types that are more masc/fem, and just making them a specific vibe but available for everyone with the expectation that people will go for other items that better match their personal style is better and less asinine than putting your head in the sand and insisting that if we don't do stupid gender limitations everyone will be forced to wear potato sacks.

[Angelivia]

Insisting that they would "have" to do that is part of the very attitude I'm talking about. There are plenty of items wearable by both model types that are more masc/fem, and just making them a specific vibe but available for everyone with the expectation that people will go for other items that better match their personal style is better and less asinine than putting your head in the sand and insisting that if we don't do stupid gender limitations everyone will be forced to wear potato sacks.

I didn't say that. I meant it could be a possibility for the unisex gear approach but added a "even if not" sentence that further describes the potential issues I'm imagining here because I'm trying to see the big picture and making an effort into regarding many people's sentiments. And in the end, I saw reason with one of your suggestions, so where exactly is the harm? Maybe you're too infuriated/passionate about that topic to read my words as well-intentioned as they are undoubtably meant.