
It's really not worth it to engage with you either, we're both clearly set in our own thoughts. You think the GM team is infallible, I think they're terrible and need to change to be better.
So lets start with this misunderstanding you have: I'm not referring to someone posting messages with "religious overtones." I wasn't even aware that was a thread at some point. So I'm not really sure where you got that from and why you're attributing it to me. If you read my original post clearly (which you did not) I stated it was multiple people. Now, to give you the benefit of the doubt, maybe you mistook me saying "the same names (yes, it's always the same character)" as meaning one individual. What I meant was, it's the same names and worlds for each person, not the same name but a different world. So your whole assumption with your last paragraph is... it's just wrong. You're wrong. I don't know what else to say about it other than you're flat out wrong.
The pf venue spam is absurd and I genuinely think something should be done about it. I'm personally not holding out hope for Dawntrail's filters to actually work. They said there will be chat filters, which is great, that's a step in the right direction, but knowing SQenix's history, I highly doubt these filters will apply to party finder. I will be shocked if I am wrong about this and will happily declare that I was wrong. I want to be wrong about this because it means they're actually taking a step in the right direction.
Now, to go back to the pf venue spam, because I know some people are going to come out and say "lmao this person wants to ban rpers" kind of like what you're doing in saying "OP wants to silence others," I'm not actually against ads. I'm not. I think it's great that there's such a large community around this scene. I don't personally interact with it, but more power to them. My issue is when there's too many of the same listing. I don't understand what's so hard about being courteous and stopping to think for a second "do we really need 8 different posts for this" and coming to the conclusion that no, we actually don't need this many. This leads me back to my first interaction with you on this thread when I told you the blacklist isn't infinite. I shouldn't have to blacklist 8 new names every two weeks to keep that section somewhat readable. It shouldn't be an issue in the first place, it should've been shut down ages ago. This is not how it's always been, this is something that's new to Endwalker. I remember when having as many as 3 listings for the same thing was considered, politely, "rude."
So now that I've gone through that, let me repeat my points for at least the sixth or seventh time on this particular thread. I believe the GM team should communicate more. I believe the GM team should be able to tell you "we don't think this is against Terms of Service." I believe the GM team should be able to give you a solid answer on that. I don't believe the GM should rely on "Although we cannot inform you of the outcome due to privacy reasons..." excuse because frankly, it's crap. How is it that so many other games are able to let you know "hey someone you reported had action taken against them" but yet the infallible Square Enix can't? It's crap, that's why.
On top of that, I have no idea what sort of thread you're reading because there's definitely a good mix of people here going "yeah the GM team is great" and "yeah the GM team kind of sucks." You're obviously in the former camp, I'm in the latter camp.
I reiterate. They're ineffective. I don't know if it's the team or the policies, but once again, it's ineffective. I don't believe that someone should get banned for "killing too many mobs" when they were trying to spawn an S rank. Remember that thread? What about back in October, the guy who streamed himself hacking in PvP and got banned from 4 or 5 different streaming sites before getting suspended from XIV? What about the people who get banned for using mods, only to have the devs turn around and put them into the game? What about the blatant disregard for the ToS by some people from the venue community? You walk into a club, you see a yell chat and ooooooh they're crafty. "My sink is named X and my sink's password is Y" as if someone's going to look at that and think "Oh, that person must have a smart sink." It's ridiculous. It's a clown show.
Now that you've built your argument around mistaking me for someone else, please move the goalposts.
I don't think they're infallible. They're human just as you and I are.
If you're going to come to a discussion forum where opposing opinions should be expected then refuse to engage with those that disagree with you, you're just showing how much of a Karen you are.
You referred to a different thread that ended up deleted and I felt I knew which one you're talking about. I thought you were the one that brought up the "Jesus spammer" but evidently misremembered. My apologies.
If your issue is the venue advertising, my comments still apply. Learn to fight your battles. Learn what is or isn't allowed. Venue advertisements in shout chat are allowed. Venue advertisements in PF are allowed. I've never seen venue ads reach the level of repetition by a single player that is required to be considered spam under the Prohibited Activities policy. The GM hands are tied on the matter. It's up to the development team to change the policy on venue advertising but opening tickets with the GMs isn't going to accomplish that. Your best bet is to submit a request once that the venue ad policy be reconsidered through Suggestions in the Support Desk.
The last thing the GM team needs to do is communicate more. That takes up their time that could be getting used to investigate and close tickets.
The GMs are not allowed to state the outcome of any report or whether action was taken period. This is not something that is discretionary on SE's part. It is mandatory due to online privacy laws in many countries. They cannot divulge information about specific players, which is what you want. The closest they can get are the weekly reports that get posted on Lodestone which display number of accounts banned for RMT/botting but not which accounts. They could add a section for bans due to social ToS violations and list the numbers but that probably still isn't going to give you the information you want.
Just what other games have told you "hey, we took action against that player you reported"? WoW never did when I was playing WoW. RIFT never did when I was playing RIFT. LotRO never did when I was playing LotRO. I didn't play DDO long enough to run into someone I needed to report so I don't know if they do or not and I haven't played any other MMOs. The response I always got, outside of one situation in WoW involving some fairly serious harassment, was "we've received your report and will investigate and take action in accordance with our policies" - which was not saying they actually took action, only that they would if it was appropriate.
There is no Prohibited Activity policy that address venue advertising frequency. You refuse to offer your personal definition of spam but based on what you say, it does not match the definition the GMs have been given to enforce the policy on chat spam.
I'm in the "GM team is generally good" camp because my interactions with the GM team have been positive though not perfect. There was one occasion where I did have to re-open my ticket to get to a GM that fully read and understood the actual issue (which I have to admit was a bit complicated).
I remember the thread about the person who claimed they were banned because they were killing too many mobs to spawn a S rank and pointed out that there's something fishy about that story because 1) other spawners aren't getting banned for doing the same thing and 2) notices of bans do not go into that much detail about the violation, nor do GMs offer additional clarification.
I don't remember the story about the PvP hacker so I can't comment because I don't know the details of exactly what happened.
The developers have been very clear about the policy on mod use. Don't use them because you'll be banned if caught by SE. If there is a game play problem that needs to be addressed, submit a Suggestion but it's still at the developers' discretion on whether the feature will be added to the game later. You're still subject to the ToS if you're using a mod to access the feature regardless of the feature being added at a later date because it was not part of the game at the time you were using the mod, thus giving you an unfair game advantage.
I have no clue what you're talking about when you say you go into venues and someone says "My sink is named X and my sink's password is Y". I don't go to venues and I ignore venue ads. Are you saying some venues are doxxing player account information or that they're trying to trick players into revealing their own? SE can't prevent player stupidity. Venues are a situation where you enter at your own risk because SE isn't responsible for online interactions between players if the situation doesn't clearly fall under prohibited policies.
You sounds like another of those players that thinks that SE is Mommy and Daddy and have to be responsible for protecting you from yourself and your own poor decision making.
They're not. You're presumably an adult. It's up to you to make decisions that are in your best interest and protect yourself.
There's no need to move goal posts here when you're still obsessing over petty stuff. The same advice still stands. Use blacklist and clear it out on a regular basis. Unless you can come up with better evidence that the venue advertising you're seeing is violating the Prohibited Activities policy, the GMs aren't going to do anything because such advertising is allowed as long as it is not sexually explicit and is not repeated in chat by one player frequently enough to reach their definition of spam.
Are you unable to play the game because someone is putting a venue advertisement in shout chat? Are you prevented from chatting with other players?Spamming
Refers to using chat (including Quick Chat in PvP content and emotes) to obstruct the gameplay of others.
Key Points
The key point to consider is whether or not the behavior is obstructing another person's gameplay. While the intention may have not been to cause an obstruction, if the situation interferes with the communication of other players then it can be determined as a prohibited activity. If a report has been filed and the prohibited activity is confirmed, a penalty will be issued.
As for things being a clown show, welcome to the human race. There are a lot of fools out there but it's also easy to deal with the majority of them without any need to involve others.
Last edited by Jojoya; 05-27-2024 at 03:21 PM.

Look, I'm gonna be honest with you, after you called me a Karen again I stopped reading your post. You're not arguing in good faith and you've moved the goalposts, just as I said you would.
So let me be crystal clear. If I'm paying monthly to play a game, there needs to be good service. I don't see that in the GM team right now. I'm saying "the community needs better and needs to be better." You're sitting over there eating crap and trying to pass it off as german chocolate. If that's what you want to do, by all means that's your right as a human being. But don't come in here and tell me to try it too, because I'm gonna call it what it is. Complete and utter crap. I'm done engaging with you.
Last edited by Jojoya; 05-27-2024 at 05:10 PM.
Player
I see OP is still insistent that the GM are in the wrong. I am not saying they never mess up or are never wrong but if they looked at the report and deemed it not a rulebreak its the decision he/she deemed was the outcome. But we know this is just about your hate for venue pfs. Blacklist em if you need to. Solve your own problems like an adult.

Why are you like this? How are you content sitting there, covering your ears and going "lalalalalalala" ? Once more, for the umpteenth time this thread- which you'd know if you bothered to read it- I'm saying the community needs better from the GM team. Whether or not my issue is against ToS or not at this point is irrelevant. I'd love to see them do something about it, but if that's really your takeaway from all of this, you're quickly shaping up to be exhibit A for when I say the community needs to be better as well.
And just to take on to that as well, I don't even know if it breaks ToS or not. I don't think the GM who contacted me does either. Because when I explicitly asked them about it, the answer they gave me was a resounding "I dunno." So again, what am I supposed to think when I actually speak to a GM and find out they either don't understand their own rules, or their policies are so crap that they can't give me a straightforward yes or no answer?
Last edited by Kazmarek; 05-28-2024 at 02:53 AM.
The problem is the op is also right. There's countless instances of gms doing absolutely nothing even with evidence presented.
Alot won't even play the game because gms do nothing about stalkers/harassers.
The main issue is they can only do so much or they will end up in hot water. If they were given the green light and tools. Alot more would be acted on and alot more would find themselves in the gaol
Hey all,
I have been reading this thread and for pre context, spam doesn't really bother me.
That said, I do think however the emote text should be off by default - I've had to message 3 sprouts over the last week that were simply just playing with emotes but it was spamming chat to let them know they could be reported and receive action on their account if someone was vindictive enough to report them. I have then explained where the toggle is for it - which i really should have to do. (I've seen a few horror story's where ppl have been reported for this)
I think with spam, ppl need to just either switch their chat box to 'event' or move areas - how we've come to the era of text spam been reported e.g emotes from a new comer I'll never understand.
I think its wrong if ppl just want to see what each emote does cause it could be considered 'spam'.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|