Results -9 to 0 of 39

Threaded View

  1. #20
    Player
    Turtledeluxe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2023
    Posts
    1,248
    Character
    Kinda Hungry
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Black Mage Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Mihka View Post
    I use strong language when discussing things I have strong opinions about, particularly when those words effectively condense multiple aspects of how I feel into a much more concise package.

    I could say "Abilities that replace a player's character model - which is often carefully glamoured after hundreds of hours to create a specific aesthetic style that is in line with the player's desired image of themselves and expression of their class identity - with a model that has a set in stone aesthetic seriously undermines character agency in the way they are perceived and the way they experience and express their job identity, which are very important factors in this game due to the high emphasis on role playing and the social aspect of the game".

    Or, I can condense the vast majority of that sentiment into "hijacking the player's character model", which effectively conveys my dislike of the system and the way it intrusively alters the job identity with no regard for a player's character aesthetic.

    As Roda said; any developer worth their salt should be capable of reading feedback and distilling it for useable information. Though, I would clarify this is usually filtered through a good community management team, whose job is to make sure the spirit of feedback reaches developers without the need for developers to spend their development time dealing with mountains of player noise every day.
    Yes. To quote myself:

    Quote Originally Posted by Turtledeluxe View Post
    That doesn't in any way make the feedback invalid or even weaker. It just feels almost distracting and redundant to say. For example

    "The job transformations are a horrible concept and should be optional."
    "The forced job transformations are a horrible concept and should be optional."

    Both things communicate the same thing, but one makes it worse by adding in this word. That's how it seems to me.
    It's really just this. I don't find it to be concise, or condensing. But you do you.

    And it's like you said, developers have a responsibility to interpret the feedback in a way most useful to them.

    I think your posts indicate that your very last concern is being "concise" and in fact, you're here to troll.
    (0)
    Last edited by Turtledeluxe; 05-17-2024 at 04:31 AM.