Quote Originally Posted by Supersnow845 View Post
I mean let’s not pretend like the reverse isn’t true, the average forum user who is fine with a change or likes the current state of something basically always resorts to the old fallacy of “you have opinion A I have counter opinion B unless you can show me overwhelming evidence of A we should assume B is right by default despite me showing no evidence of B”

Functionally anytime someone makes an argument someone will hit them with “well this is just the forum people who are happy aren’t coming to the forum to complain”, it’s not like square ever releases data on whether something is popular or not

Let’s not pretend like “i made an argument everyone has to agree with me” is the only form of problematic argument



Literally perfect example in the next comment, “they probably are popular, let’s just assume they are popular” and not “hey they might not actually listen to feedback as much as we think they do
My dude, just about everything they do is in response to feedback. 2 minute meta? Feedback. Tank and healer remake in shb? Feedback. Everything they've done post launch with housing is feedback. Glamour plates? Feedback. They cut the exploratory mission in EW because of feedback and they are bringing it back in DT because of the counter feedback. They brought back a deep dungeon because of feedback but that got morbin timed. Criterion is a direct response to the endless asks for smaller group hard content. Dedicated face slot and dye channels? Feedback. It was interesting when the response to kaiten's removal wasn't strong enough to get them to reverse course on that but it did get them to not go forward with some other changes they had planned.