I see this claim put around that people are "unwilling to accept there are flaws", but it's just not true. There are things that everyone, almost universally accepts is a problem.
For example, a reasonable person cannot look at a story that spans the base game, 5 expansions and all their patches and say that it isn't a daunting climb for many players.
A reasonable person can't say that ARR isn't off-putting in some ways with issues such as no mounts until half way into the MSQ, needing to return to the Waking Sands every 5 seconds, item level creep making fight mechanics irrelevant, excessive loading screens compared to expansions, excessive unlock quests for every little thing (like glamour), a non-intuitive map that is only usable when you get used to it, poor default setting choices and HUD Layout compared to some MMORPGs, forced cutscenes out of the blue at level 50, lack of voice acting and inconsistent voice acting in ARR, driving sprouts head-first into high-end Extreme trials to "clear it for the quest" resulting in mentors being dragged into them, lack of experience gain from patch quests that makes progression feel too slow (for players who don't know we had patches).
In places like the novice network you will often see constant defense of the game but on points like the ones above, nobody defends all of that and just has to reluctantly tell them it's one of the issues the game has.
But everyone just throws the "nobody criticises the game" card because someone disagrees with their criticism.
For myself, it's usually not about why it's impossible, but about why SE says it's impossible. I have a pretty good memory for the countless interviews I've read over the years so I just reference that and reiterate what they've said, regardless of its merit. But in most cases they probably would not say "it's difficult" if it wasn't difficult for them.you can see them whenever you make a thread just suggesting a minor quality of life adjustment and they pull up to tell you why that's impossible for square to do, as if they know any more about the development process than we do.
However I do have quite a good understanding of this stuff as well so to a degree I can contribute my own assessment of if something would be possible and what the likely issues would be (for example my assessment of DC travel being possible was accurate before we got it, which I pointed out we had with paid transfers as well as infrastructure for it from world visiting and I also pointed out the UI team's claim that a checkmark on collected items was impossible, was just wrong and then they subsequently proved that assessment right by adding it).
I find that bizarre. These people don't represent me or anyone I've ever met or talked to in the community. There's always going to be that weirdo that does something like that on the internet I guess, but they certainly don't represent a whole community of people.



Reply With Quote






