Quote Originally Posted by Xirean View Post
I actually can. I brought that up because people keep wanting to compare it to reality. I firmly stand by my point that this is a fantasy game and therefore we don't need to care about a lot of things like armor shape. But also if people really do want to compare this to reality there's certainly things you can draw upon.

You made the point either in this thread or the other that armor shape should be a concern based on how that would actually work in a fight as opposed to aesthetic. Why not both designs? It's a fantasy game and the individual player should have those options of what appeals to them. For me that's having racial traits be displayed, at least on my character, at all times. If a piece of equipment doesn't allow for that then I never use it. It's a dead piece of gear for me. If there were options to allow for both avenues then more people could use those pieces.
you say a choice is good, i agrees, yet it seems that every time an option is given for outfits without the ears people loose their collective minds, i get your advocating for a toggle, i have brought that ideal up as well in the past, but in the mean time, 80% of the outfits have the ears, leave the 20% i like alone thanks.

as for the people comparing it to reality, i was also responding to others forcing the conversation in that direction, and feel like you were trying to rail me for it, so yeah i'm gonna look at you like a hypocrite for trying to use the argument yourself.

you know that that we agree for the most part, i just disagree that they should make all the outfits one way, let there be diversity. or let lazy square make a toggle, but i doubt they will, they wont make hats work for some of our races already, let alone make them work twice for one race.