That's stupid if so. People keep saying this but I've said I was wrong about multiple things in the past.
If the metric of being reasonable is admitting to being wrong in cases one isn't...that's not a reasonable standard.
Besides which, my own position already incorporates that, doesn't it?
I don't say "No one wants more damage buttons" because I KNOW that many people do. I also know that not ALL people do so there needs to be exception for them. But folks like you refuse to admit that. Multiple times in this thread I've been called the only person with my position despite SEVERAL OTHER POSTERS (I can go back and quote their posts) also said they don't want more damage buttons/complexity on healers. So who is wrong and not admitting it?
It's not "obvious" when you use exaggerations. THAT WAS WHY I had in my signature for a while (until Sebazy beat it out of me) "try not to use hyperbole". Hyperbole/exageration is like sarcasm, it doesn't translate to text well unless you mark it as /sarc or the like. I don't, in fact, know you don't mean "literally the most no effort thing you can do" when you say "no effort". I think of what, in my mind, "no effort" would be if you don't specify or spell it out. If you had said "little effort on their DPS rotation", I would probably have agreed with that. But that isn't what you said.
My dude, I'm not a mind reader. Clearly.
I don't "attack people personally" or "get completely indignant" with people who haven't attacked me personally, I don't "insist people completely misunderstand" except when people AREN'T "totally getting what I mean". When people say, as you did in your last post, "Is this summary correct?" when it very much is not, what do you want me to say? "Yes, it's correct"? When you say "You want no complexity to healers", but I DO want complexity, just healing complexity not DPS complexity, am I supposed to say "Yes, that's correct" when it's not?
That is, are you asking me to outright lie to and mislead you?



Reply With Quote

