Exactly. Once or twice is fine but they've been doing this for six years now and it's really getting stale. There's really only so many times they can use the existentialist/defying fate trope before it completely loses its power.I wholeheartedly agree with you. The entire 6.0 EW MSQ and the whole concepts of Dynamis and "The universe and its world have fallen to depression and that's why they're all dead" is quite boring to me. Perhaps one of the most boring universe-themed concepts I have seen so far. I'd really enjoy a return to the ARR/HW style of story-writing with its grey morality.
Dealing with bad-faith forum posters who tell you to quit or say your concern is in the minority:Be firm but polite, recognize their tactics and don't fall into their traps.
- Do not engage in their bad-faith attacks.
- Warn others of their bad-faith if they have a long history of it.
- Continue the productive conversation and silently report them for personal attacks.
There is also beauty in consistency. These characters have been around since 1.0 days, they're not gonna just drastically change, they have developed their personalities and characteristics to become who they are all these years as we've watched their progression. If Y'shtola suddenly became lazy or an a**hole a character that wouldn't make sense right? So their belief in friendship and lending a hand and never giving up is gonna play into how they react to the events of the story, so yes, all of these expansions are going to include things that challenge those characteristics, such as existential crises, defying fate, etc...
Y'shtola's character is now essentially "cat in a humanoid body", either or both would be entirely in keeping.
To answer the broader point, why should I remain invested when the same thing that worked last expansion and the one before is also being used this expansion to the same effect? There's only so many times the same story can be told in different settings before it wears thin or outstays its welcome. We are already at this point, and it's not like stuffing an entire calamity into a potato wasn't straining credulity to begin with. This isn't portal after all.
Personally I think the tone and characterisation of ARR and HW hit a pretty good spot that hasn't really been matched since. I don't think either was perfect by any stretch, but the characters weren't all an amorphous, interchangeable mass all parroting the same answer in unison, like a particularly echoey reddit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.