-WHM is not the only uncleansable CC if you count MNK/DNC/RPR LB. AST has overall more crowd control more often if they prioritize it, though it does hurt their healing capacity. I've already counted MoN on a double value anyway, so.
-You can add up BRD potencies yourself if you don't believe me. DRG can almost match BRD's entire burst just by pressing Wyrmwind + Nastrond (on <50%). Full stack Empyreal is significantly less than a Recuperate. Full range PP is one of the weakest burst-type buttons in the game, not even breaking 10k potency. 1+1+1 doesn't =5. If a BRD's burst feels impactful, it's because they're placing it correctly and not just blindly relying on value.
-WAR mobility is nothing to sneeze at. RDM values have been addressed in this thread already. It's not rated as "strictly poor", but relative to the options that some other jobs have, it is indeed relatively not as good.
I understand that DRG will be pressing more buttons, but that's not the point. The point is that a DRG can match value even if they DON'T press fully optimal buttons. There is no universe where you can make the argument that the two are in contention for best STB.
The value of Paean was accounted for by awarding BRD its free point in the DEF category; BRD has no other defensive offerings, so it had nothing with which to score more highly. LB is a 10% damage buff, which WHM can provide twice as often (+healing amp + regen), and AST can triple in the short term. The LB battery effect isn't quantified anywhere in writing, so it's impossible to actually judge how valuable it is in cheating the LB economy. What's the magic bullet here? Creating a "Utility" score and giving BRD a 5?
If adding tooltips is so braindead and BRD burst is so insane, then why doesn't everyone just go pick up all these free kills with this crazy burst and overwhelming party value?
Don't worry, it's not you! I've enjoyed your feedback a lot actually. As for the contradiction, I never intended for this to be "This Is The Only Tier List Ever", it was more of a math experiment--sorry if that never came across for everyone. That's why that contradictory caveat was placed there--for the MtG players among us, remember that can't always beats can: this system is making an ATTEMPT to quantify, but where it's cannot, it cannot. That's why that disclaimer is there.


Reply With Quote


