Yet another SMN thread: SMN is the only job that doesn't have a gauge/proc management

[Deo14]

Wrong answer, McFly.

Try again.

Also, it appears I was wrong in my assessment of your position. My fair and even assessment was entirely inaccurate and wrong, and I apologize for ascribing honorable and well thought out notions to you. I will not do so again.

You try again, finally answer me why is it fair that one job becomes redundant because of the other job.

It's up to you to think that I'm asshole (I won't deny it), but anyone can check my post history to see that I very rarely, if even, don't give someone a chance when I speak with them for the first few times. I've started discussions with you on even ground, no sarcastic remarks, just a polite discussions, same goes for that guy who said that PLD is harder than DRK, who thought I was offending him by explaining PLD rotation to him. But if it turns out that the person who I speak to starts to talk out of their ass, or even uses underhanded tactics, like you when you intentionally misquoted a quote to alter your argument, then I will stop acting nice, it's that simple.

I apologize to anyone who read that and thought that the people arguing against SMN were or are doing so in good faith, as apparently, they are not. Well, at least one of them + the (6) likes (at the time of this post) is not.

I suggest you start putting "I apologize to anyone who read that" at the end of your essays, or in your signature.

People who want SMN to have some skill ceiling do so in good faith - but not for the sake of SMN, but for the sake of RDM. I understand that reworks can be frustrating, I'm SAM main after all, but denying changes to SMN is very selfish behaviour, it's not about SMN, it's mainly about poor RDM who ended up as unwanted child for the mix of balance issues and because RDM doesn't offer much more than SMN, while being significantly harder to play.

Seems to me your plan was to keep irritating us, until we started to get unhinged and started to tell the things as they are, without filter, so that we seem like we're the bad guys. But I already told you before - even if there is bad faith, or personal attack in the response, it doesn't invalidate any points, whether they're good or bad. You can try to be mature, use your fancy words and essays to seem like you're in the right, but you're still missing the meat of your argument, the valid points.