Quote Originally Posted by Ath192 View Post
Okay but the question is why don’t they spend their time on the forums providing their feedback instead of chastising people they deem too negative?

Because by all accounts that doesn’t make sense and the mud slinging doesn’t really start until someone posts a criticism and a “white knight” goes on to invalidate someone else criticism. And thus the cycle begins.

TBH a lot of people who claim to be “positive” really enjoy attacking and destroying others arguments on here for the hell of it. They also enjoy pointing out any issue they can find in others instead of trying to understand the main point the critical poster is getting at. That doesn’t seem very positive at all does it? It’s just the same toxicity with a different spin.
Depends what you mean by feedback. Speaking positively about the game is a type of feedback, and it would be depressing if all we had to do is attack the game. Besides, I think many so-called 'white knights' do still accept the games flaws. Its just not everyone thinks such flaws negate the games enjoyability. Some of the negative posts here make it sound like any attempt to disagree or question with said criticism is ‘boot licking’ and akin to saying the game is perfect, without there being any middle ground. Plus, there are a number of folk here who are not acting in good faith. Many of the negative threads are pure troll bait, or our full of bias that they do require actual debate rather then just ‘I agree or disagree.’

Both sides certainly have a toxic element to them sure, but personally speaking I find the scales do tip more in one direction then the other, even if you and others will likely dissagree.