Quote Originally Posted by Stormpeaks View Post
You seem to really love the use of "stalking" and "obsessive", you also called me on "stalking" behavior because I post in the forums, all that because I dislike some parts of the game, while I like others.

Looks like you could use a dictionary to know what the words you use actually mean instead of throwing them all over the place.



Found the post for reference
Stalking the forums, not individual people. Some words have multiple definitions, you know? Maybe if you did more than sit in your digital house all day while making seethe posts on the forum, you'd know that.

Quote Originally Posted by Theodric View Post
I'd be inclined to suspect that I've hit a nerve by calling out such individuals, given how weirdly defensive you have become across multiple threads and your trend of latching on to that one specific part of posts commenting on various issues of the game. At no point did I claim that such individuals are exclusively to blame for the game's currently perceived predicament, though it can't really be denied in good faith at this point that they're an increasingly vocal portion of the game's player base.

Quite a few of us have been asking for more character customisation for male characters for years - including masculine hairstyles, cash shop outfits and eyebrows for highlander men. So far, the game has doubled down on catering largely to the Twitter crowd and their often niche but vocal tastes.

Then, in turn, some of us express concern and face these rather bizarre accusations because we want a proper bone thrown our way from time to time.

In other words, I would kindly ask that you cease re-framing discussion points in bad faith.
I don't need to have a personal stake in something to make light of the intellectual laziness inherent in grabbing a group that generally minds its own business and probably doesn't post on these forums and pinning the blame on them. I know you think nobody will bat for that group, and rightfully so- because those players interact very little with people who fall outside of their cliques and therefore do not build up any kind of rapport with different arms of the community. That also makes them low-hanging fruit.

But I'm sure you're a 100% convinced that the very same group you malign for chronically ignoring and avoiding all content is also the group responsible for there allegedly being less content. Because a group that doesn't engage with the existing content (voluntarily or not) is most definitely going to be concerned with culling that which they're already ignoring as is.

And I would request that you start discussing in good faith, as well as refrain from being two-faced, making bold, generalizing statements when on the offensive and then turning around and appealing to some sort of sense of forum honor and etiquette when you're called out on your poor conduct while playing at being meek.

Try again.