And what happens if they didn't post the short story resolving the two different versions of the sundering? Which version would we accept as canon?
We already addressed this. You're falling behind.If the cutscene wasn't an allegory/metaphorical, then what's your answer to Hytholdeus walking calmly past a giant man-eating monster with neither of them caring about each other? Did Venat also literally walk down a smoky hallway covered in blood while seeing shades of sad and angry people?
You don’t need the writers to hold your hand to be able to reconcile the fact that Hydaelyn stomped Zodiark and had more than just 1 reason to be summoned, as was stated back in the Shadowbringers patches.
But maybe we do need handholding and we need giant flashing warnings in cutscenes now to tell us whether what we’re seeing is an artistic description of events condensed into one thing or if it’s meant to be taken literally.
Again, I think they should’ve done it literally and showed us the fight we should’ve had.
I was hoping for a better response than the one you gave that cherry picks parts of the cutscene that support your idea that it’s meant to be literal, but the part of it is “obviously metaphorical” doesn’t count so you’re supposed to think it’s literal and then metaphorical.
I don't think the question is whether it's an allegory. It clearly is.If the cutscene wasn't an allegory/metaphorical, then what's your answer to Hytholdeus walking calmly past a giant man-eating monster with neither of them caring about each other? Did Venat also literally walk down a smoky hallway covered in blood while seeing shades of sad and angry people?
The problem is seeing where in that allegory you're supposed to see the allegorical outline of an epic fight between Hydaelyn and Zodiark, given that Venat seems to engage in sundering the world for purely philosophical reasons and not in battle.
There was an event where a person got killed by a monster. There was an event where Hythlodaeus farewelled Hades. They didn't happen at the same time but we see them overlapping.
By that assumption, the argument between Venat and the Zodiark worshippers also happened, but perhaps not in that time and place.
Where then is the room for the clash of primals? When do we shift from overlapping "real" events to pure metaphor? We clearly have by the time of Hydaelyn's "final walk", but that seems different to what came before.
Last edited by Iscah; 04-14-2023 at 02:16 PM.
The bait is strong in this thread.
In the endwalker cutscene, whats the metaphor for hydaelyn's battle with zodiark? You can't answer that, can you.You don’t need the writers to hold your hand to be able to reconcile the fact that Hydaelyn stomped Zodiark and had more than just 1 reason to be summoned, as was stated back in the Shadowbringers patches. But maybe we do need handholding and we need giant flashing warnings in cutscenes now to tell us whether what we’re seeing is an artistic description of events condensed into one thing or if it’s meant to be taken literally.
If you’d been following the OP, he doesn’t think it’s an allegory.
I want to know why they didn’t put it in there too.
But just because they made a weird decision not to show it doesn’t mean that the writers for some reason decided to backtrack on it ever happening and then backtracked on backtracking and put it back in through short stories and jackets.
Honestly, this is an interesting thing to think about. If Tales of the Dawn didn't exist to correct the inconsistency between ShB's and EW's versions of what the true cause of the sundering was, I would probably go with ShB's version of the Sundering just because I like it more, lmao.
Let's be real here. Tales of the Dawn does help provide clarity to the audience on what the cause of the Sundering was. I want to say that it was definitely put there to help clear things up.
I seem to have missed Tales of the Dawn adding new information on this? Venat's chapter with the Watcher was bogged down in as much vagueness as the cutscene.Honestly, this is an interesting thing to think about. If Tales of the Dawn didn't exist to correct the inconsistency between ShB's and EW's versions of what the true cause of the sundering was, I would probably go with ShB's version of the Sundering just because I like it more, lmao.
The Tales of the Dawn sidestory, A Friendship of Record, seems a little more indicative of there being some kind of fight between Hydaelyn and Zodiark.
"Venat's faction thus resolved to manifest an entity capable of shackling that power. To have any chance at defeating the nigh-omnipotent Zodiark, however, the sacrifice must be absolute."
- https://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodes.../#sidestory_01
The language is still somewhat ambiguous as it doesn't explicitly say "Hydaelyn and Zodiark go head to head in a battle," or something along those lines, but I can at least now believe that there was some sort of major conflict between them prior to the Sundering.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.