Inconsistencies with the sundering (Spoilers)

[kpxmanifesto]

but it's too late and the damage has already been done.

Oh, for sure. My friends that played through MSQ are still under the impression that Venat just did the sundering all by herself and that it was not the result of the conflict between Hydaelyn and Zodiark. I had to link them to the Tales of the Dawn webpage which I didn't even know existed until someone else posted it in this thread.

[PeaTearGriffin]

Oh, for sure. My friends that played through MSQ are still under the impression that Venat just did the sundering all by herself and that it was not the result of the conflict between Hydaelyn and Zodiark. I had to link them to the Tales of the Dawn webpage which I didn't even know existed until someone else posted it in this thread.

Its funny to think how easy it could've been to avoid retconning the shadowbringers version of the sundering. Square could've just had venat say one more line in the sundering cutscene like the quote from Tales of the Dawn: "To have any chance at defeating the nigh-omnipotent Zodiark, however, the sacrifice must be absolute." But no... lets not make any mention of zodiark vs. hydaelyn in this very important cutscene.

[Atelier-Bagur]

Its funny to think how easy it could've been to avoid retconning the shadowbringers version of the sundering. Square could've just had venat say one more line in the sundering cutscene like the quote from Tales of the Dawn: "To have any chance at defeating the nigh-omnipotent Zodiark, however, the sacrifice must be absolute." But no... lets not make any mention of zodiark vs. hydaelyn in this very important cutscene.

again, what is this "magical" retcon of the sundering explained in shadowbringers?