And that's why the OP is calling it a retcon. Such a crucial and definitive moment in the game and the writer forgets or refuses to add that in?
This is a textbook example of Reductio ad Absurdum. It's not going to work here.If we’re going by the “official” definition you provided, then this whole game was retconned in ShB when it was revealed that the Ascians are Ancients. Or when we find out that Zodiark and Hydaelyn are primals. Or when we find out in post-ARR that Ascian powers are also the Echo and later in ShB that it’s due to some soul memory thing. Or in SB when we find out that Emet-Selch was Solus.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.