1 House 1 FC per DC Only

[CatStarwind]

I mean considering the fact that I've not changed in position as Jojoya implied, it would be strange to call it gaslighting. I do wonder what it's called, however, when someone fabricates a narrative. I look forward to the examples you have in store for me, I'm sure you just forgot to include them this time.

[Nepentha]

I mean considering the fact that I've not changed in position as Jojoya implied, it would be strange to call it gaslighting. I do wonder what it's called, however, when someone fabricates a narrative. I look forward to the examples you have in store for me, I'm sure you just forgot to include them this time.

Dude, don't be disingenuous. We saw the posts you originally made, complete with links and screenshots. And then they were gone, removed. I guess that works in your favor eh?

[PaalHenrik]

Dude, don't be disingenuous. We saw the posts you originally made, complete with links and screenshots. And then they were gone, removed. I guess that works in your favor eh?

Don't forget about the one that was locked by a mod. He thinks it's a victory.

[CatStarwind]

Dude, don't be disingenuous. We saw the posts you originally made, complete with links and screenshots. And then they were gone, removed. I guess that works in your favor eh?

How very convenient for you then. The thread was judged to be in violation to the forum rules and it was removed. While I disagree with the reason, I accept that it was against the rules. It's honestly not that hard to do so, I highly recommend it.

Don't forget about the one that was locked by a mod. He thinks it's a victory.

I mean, did you not read the title of that thread?

[Nepentha]

How very convenient for you then. The thread was judged to be in violation to the forum rules and it was removed. While I disagree with the reason, I accept that it was against the rules. It's honestly not that hard to do so, I highly recommend it.

I've never had one thread removed for violating the forum rules, let alone two.

[Themarvin]

I mean considering the fact that I've not changed in position as Jojoya implied, it would be strange to call it gaslighting. I do wonder what it's called, however, when someone fabricates a narrative. I look forward to the examples you have in store for me, I'm sure you just forgot to include them this time.

Please make your own thread to troll in or whatever -_-

[ChooChooTraaaaaaaaain]

I mean considering the fact that I've not changed in position as Jojoya implied, it would be strange to call it gaslighting. I do wonder what it's called, however, when someone fabricates a narrative. I look forward to the examples you have in store for me, I'm sure you just forgot to include them this time.

Always a smart mouth, but never a smart reply.

Let's analyze what you did and help add the clarity that gets lost in posts that multi-quote with no actual substance other than to create confusion and attempt to appear sophisticated and confident to passing readers:

What you did:

You took a line from the Additional Plots and Purchasing Guide that states a conditional, not a rule, about a quantity of housing.


(Image from referenced post.)

You then picked and immediately followed up with a line from the actual FFXIV Terms of Service. Your goal here was to present them in a manner that gives it the appearance and feel of being an official rule in the Terms of Service.

With this you presented your argument saying multi-ownership involves circumvention and violates section 2.1 Cheating and Botting.

This was deliberately to mislead, misrepresent, and deceive people into believing the two excerpts to be of equal impact and to validate your stance on tying multi-ownership to circumvention of rules, therefore making it possible to argue that these actions are susceptible to consequence and enforcement detailed under 2.1 Cheating and Botting in the Terms of Service.

This is the very definition of GASLIGHTING.

No gratuitous amount forum styling or toxic posting required.

You are threatened by text styling because it does it's job to show people what kind of fraud you are. It is already a known fact that general users may struggle with reading whether it be the placard, the housing agreement pre-bidding, or even forum posts. You know full well of that fact and intend to take advantage of it to push your misinformation campaign.

Let us point out that up until this point, you have continually failed to produce any justification, connection, or evidence between the nature of how people acquire their plots and how it is justifiably a violation of the Terms of Service or any policy officially stated and detailed as a stance on housing by Square Enix.