Quote Originally Posted by Reinha View Post
It's not a bug or an exploit if the official housing guide describes the conditions and steps required to buy additional houses.
By all means, point to where it explicitly mentions that being the intention; in direct opposition to the listed Requirements. I'll even ignore the fact that what you're referencing is under the Temporary section.

Quote Originally Posted by ChooChooTraaaaaaaaain View Post
As always, no answers produced. No evidence produced. No substance produced.
Then what are you replying to?

Quote Originally Posted by ChooChooTraaaaaaaaain View Post
The argument you are pushing about Land Ownership does not reside in the Terms of Service, or even indirectly.
Yes. First, it's not an argument it's a statement of fact. Second, and in this context, both must be observed as we are dealing with an exploit, which is, as the TOS puts it "taking advantage game system[s]".

To put it simply, a requirement is laid out in how a game system ought to work; in this case the FC purchase and ownership. Strictly from the Requirements, in plain language it limits 1 Service Account, on 1 World to 1 FC plot. Circumventing this with a temporary stop-gap can and is considered an exploit as it is taking advantage of a loophole for a purpose not intended.

That's it. That's all there is to it. No gratuitous amount forum styling or toxic posting required. I'm not even sure why the majority of your point included a situation I have not touched on (multiple service accounts), other than for the fact you don't actually have anything to say.

Quote Originally Posted by ChooChooTraaaaaaaaain View Post
Enforcement begins with yourself.
So true, that's how SE got into this mess in the first place. Too much faith in peoples humanities.

Quote Originally Posted by Nepentha View Post
I'm guessing you'll just shift those goals again.
By all means illustrate your point, my post history is public here. Otherwise I'm not sure what the point of gaslighting this is.

Quote Originally Posted by Jojoya View Post
While I've got my own issue with that poster to the point I've stopped engaging with him, calling him a psychopath is going too far. That's not how a psychopath behaves at all.

I think the word you should have used is "fanatic".

If you want to try to keep reasoning with him, that's your option. Most of us have given up because he's beyond reason. He's got his opinion and he will not stray from it.
"It is what it is" is hardly a 'reason'. At least it does seem you have some modicum of limit to the abuse thrown around by the people you defend. Good for you.

Quote Originally Posted by ChooChooTraaaaaaaaain View Post
If this part of the forum were to choose one thing to at least agree on, it should be to slam the report button on this guy until this goblin is purged. Full stop.
Calling for mass reporting on a single user for no legitimate reason? Oh my.