1 House 1 FC per DC Only

[ChooChooTraaaaaaaaain]

Yeah? And who am I accusing of specifically?

You yourself don't even know.

You do not even have a shred of proof that details an actual RMT transaction between any parties. You and everyone before you. Nothing but assumptions.
All you do is wave around the Terms of Service like some Bible trying to ward away heretics, but without actually reading or acknowledging the nature of it's contents.

That's what a psychopath does.

By the way. The Terms of Service is not evidence.

[Nepentha]

You yourself don't even know.

You do not even have a shred of proof that details an actual RMT transaction between any parties. You and everyone before you. Nothing but assumptions.
All you do is wave around the Terms of Service like some Bible trying to ward away heretics, but without actually reading or acknowledging the nature of it's contents.

That's what a psychopath does.

By the way. The Terms of Service is not evidence.

It's pearl clutching that it's possible, and therefore constitutes an emergency that must immediately be acted upon. Also disingenuous, considering they had at least two threads removed because they actually did post names and screenshots. So now we get "I'm not touching you" responses as if all of us who saw those posts have forgotten them.

[CatStarwind]

You yourself don't even know.

I do know, the answer is no one.

Show the part in the Terms of Service where it actually defines that multiple ownership on a single account will be met with enforcement or consequences.

By the way. The Terms of Service is not evidence.

Well which one is it? It certainly looks like appeasement

So now we get "I'm not touching you" responses as if all of us who saw those posts have forgotten them.

is always a mistake.

If you have something to offer go for it otherwise the goal post moving is getting pretty trite. But for the sake of posterity I will again post the relevant sections.

Land Ownership - You do not have a character on the same World on the same service account that purchased and maintains a free company plot

2.1 Cheating and Botting. You may not create or use any unauthorized cheats, bots, automation software, hacks, mods or any other unauthorized software or hardware designed to modify the Game and gameplay. In addition, you may not take advantage of game system bugs and exploits during gameplay.

[PaalHenrik]

words

Your first point: It's a guidance. Not a restriction.

Your second point: It is not a bug or an exploit to be able to purchase more than one FC house.

Not against the ToS.

[Nepentha]

If you have something to offer go for it otherwise the goal post moving is getting pretty trite. But for the sake of posterity I will again post the relevant sections.

You haven't shown that owning more than on FC house per world is actually a bug or exploit, despite latching onto this idea and pushing it constantly.

Also, what goalpost shifting? You already posted two threads that were removed, we haven't forgotten they were there. This entire crusade of yours came about because you saw something you didn't like and /you/ have been busy goalpost shifting to justify it this entire time.

I'm guessing you'll just shift those goals again.

[Jojoya]

That's what a psychopath does.

While I've got my own issue with that poster to the point I've stopped engaging with him, calling him a psychopath is going too far. That's not how a psychopath behaves at all.

I think the word you should have used is "fanatic".

If you want to try to keep reasoning with him, that's your option. Most of us have given up because he's beyond reason. He's got his opinion and he will not stray from it.

[ChooChooTraaaaaaaaain]

While I've got my own issue with that poster to the point I've stopped engaging with him, calling him a psychopath is going too far. That's not how a psychopath behaves at all.

I think the word you should have used is "fanatic".

If you want to try to keep reasoning with him, that's your option. Most of us have given up because he's beyond reason. He's got his opinion and he will not stray from it.

With all do respect Mr. Jojoya but what I'm about to type somewhat contradicts what I am about to ask of you. Being that you are one of the most active posters in this forum I feel you should lead by example and shelve the picky opinions about trivial things like choice of thesaurus use. It would allow this forum to stay on target more often given the climate of this forum section and how easily people's emotion's are piqued by the smallest things.

Now, let me make it very clear.
This is not a reasoning. I am not asking for a compromise or settlement.

I am here to call out someone who is flatly wrong and using people's emotions (such as the example above regarding trivial details) in this forum to mislead and portray what is actually right and wrong and grey area in a way that serves his personal narrative. He is not here to represent people who are for or against housing ownership and it's future state. He simply needs you to fuel his ridiculous crusade by taking advantage of the chaotic situation.

If this part of the forum were to choose one thing to at least agree on, it should be to slam the report button on this guy until this goblin is purged. Full stop.

[PredatoryCatgirl]

If this part of the forum were to choose one thing to at least agree on, it should be to slam the report button on this guy until this goblin is purged. Full stop.

Considering how seriously people don't take him, that's kind of like trying to kill a gnat with a machine gun, don't you think?

[PaalHenrik]

Considering how seriously people don't take him, that's kind of like trying to kill a gnat with a machine gun, don't you think?

This mental picture made me laugh so hard. Thanks!

[CatStarwind]

It's not a bug or an exploit if the official housing guide describes the conditions and steps required to buy additional houses.

By all means, point to where it explicitly mentions that being the intention; in direct opposition to the listed Requirements. I'll even ignore the fact that what you're referencing is under the Temporary section.

As always, no answers produced. No evidence produced. No substance produced.

Then what are you replying to?

The argument you are pushing about Land Ownership does not reside in the Terms of Service, or even indirectly.

Yes. First, it's not an argument it's a statement of fact. Second, and in this context, both must be observed as we are dealing with an exploit, which is, as the TOS puts it "taking advantage game system[s]".

To put it simply, a requirement is laid out in how a game system ought to work; in this case the FC purchase and ownership. Strictly from the Requirements, in plain language it limits 1 Service Account, on 1 World to 1 FC plot. Circumventing this with a temporary stop-gap can and is considered an exploit as it is taking advantage of a loophole for a purpose not intended.

That's it. That's all there is to it. No gratuitous amount forum styling or toxic posting required. I'm not even sure why the majority of your point included a situation I have not touched on (multiple service accounts), other than for the fact you don't actually have anything to say.

Enforcement begins with yourself.

So true, that's how SE got into this mess in the first place. Too much faith in peoples humanities.

I'm guessing you'll just shift those goals again.

By all means illustrate your point, my post history is public here. Otherwise I'm not sure what the point of gaslighting this is.

While I've got my own issue with that poster to the point I've stopped engaging with him, calling him a psychopath is going too far. That's not how a psychopath behaves at all.

I think the word you should have used is "fanatic".

If you want to try to keep reasoning with him, that's your option. Most of us have given up because he's beyond reason. He's got his opinion and he will not stray from it.

"It is what it is" is hardly a 'reason'. At least it does seem you have some modicum of limit to the abuse thrown around by the people you defend. Good for you.

If this part of the forum were to choose one thing to at least agree on, it should be to slam the report button on this guy until this goblin is purged. Full stop.

Calling for mass reporting on a single user for no legitimate reason? Oh my.