1 House 1 FC per DC Only

[PaalHenrik]

Abusing workshops/submarines can allow for some crafty RMTing apparently.

There it is again. The premise for your very first piggyback post. Accusing people of RMT. We've come full circle.

[Themarvin]

There it is again. The premise for your very first piggyback post. Accusing people of RMT. We've come full circle.

But you are saying that it is not? Why should people allow them self to exploit their way with current system to multiple FC houses that takes op plots, it would be better to get rid of the houses and instead making them into guildhalls accessed by the Grand Company you founded the FC at and make it kind of like the squadrons or something down those lines and maybe with a touch of Island Sanctuary as well, but with apartments and a workshop door inside.

FC's need little room to make them keep on going, and instancing it like this would also take alot of ressources away from the server as well, before yelling up about people 'losing' medium/large houses on their FC's and the likes, then take a look of the current business of same named FC's that from place to place block entire wards, serving little use to the health of any of the servers community.

[Stormpeaks]

But you are saying that it is not? Why should people allow them self to exploit their way with current system to multiple FC houses that takes op plots, it would be better to get rid of the houses and instead making them into guildhalls accessed by the Grand Company you founded the FC at and make it kind of like the squadrons or something down those lines and maybe with a touch of Island Sanctuary as well, but with apartments and a workshop door inside.

FC's need little room to make them keep on going, and instancing it like this would also take alot of ressources away from the server as well, before yelling up about people 'losing' medium/large houses on their FC's and the likes, then take a look of the current business of same named FC's that from place to place block entire wards, serving little use to the health of any of the servers community.

No.

And no.

Thanks for the suggestion though

[PaalHenrik]

But you are saying that it is not? Why should people allow them self to exploit their way with current system to multiple FC houses that takes op plots, it would be better to get rid of the houses and instead making them into guildhalls accessed by the Grand Company you founded the FC at and make it kind of like the squadrons or something down those lines and maybe with a touch of Island Sanctuary as well, but with apartments and a workshop door inside.

FC's need little room to make them keep on going, and instancing it like this would also take alot of ressources away from the server as well, before yelling up about people 'losing' medium/large houses on their FC's and the likes, then take a look of the current business of same named FC's that from place to place block entire wards, serving little use to the health of any of the servers community.

Didcha forget to log into your catstarwind account?

[CatStarwind]

There it is again. The premise for your very first piggyback post. Accusing people of RMT. We've come full circle.

Yeah? And who am I accusing of specifically?

[Themarvin]

Didcha forget to log into your catstarwind account?

Huh?

I will let you, to your little problems, however you are wrong, I am an entirely different person.

[ChooChooTraaaaaaaaain]

Yeah? And who am I accusing of specifically?

You yourself don't even know.

You do not even have a shred of proof that details an actual RMT transaction between any parties. You and everyone before you. Nothing but assumptions.
All you do is wave around the Terms of Service like some Bible trying to ward away heretics, but without actually reading or acknowledging the nature of it's contents.

That's what a psychopath does.

By the way. The Terms of Service is not evidence.

[Nepentha]

You yourself don't even know.

You do not even have a shred of proof that details an actual RMT transaction between any parties. You and everyone before you. Nothing but assumptions.
All you do is wave around the Terms of Service like some Bible trying to ward away heretics, but without actually reading or acknowledging the nature of it's contents.

That's what a psychopath does.

By the way. The Terms of Service is not evidence.

It's pearl clutching that it's possible, and therefore constitutes an emergency that must immediately be acted upon. Also disingenuous, considering they had at least two threads removed because they actually did post names and screenshots. So now we get "I'm not touching you" responses as if all of us who saw those posts have forgotten them.

[CatStarwind]

You yourself don't even know.

I do know, the answer is no one.

Show the part in the Terms of Service where it actually defines that multiple ownership on a single account will be met with enforcement or consequences.

By the way. The Terms of Service is not evidence.

Well which one is it? It certainly looks like appeasement

So now we get "I'm not touching you" responses as if all of us who saw those posts have forgotten them.

is always a mistake.

If you have something to offer go for it otherwise the goal post moving is getting pretty trite. But for the sake of posterity I will again post the relevant sections.

Land Ownership - You do not have a character on the same World on the same service account that purchased and maintains a free company plot

2.1 Cheating and Botting. You may not create or use any unauthorized cheats, bots, automation software, hacks, mods or any other unauthorized software or hardware designed to modify the Game and gameplay. In addition, you may not take advantage of game system bugs and exploits during gameplay.

[Reinha]

It's not a bug or an exploit if the official housing guide describes the conditions and steps required to buy additional houses.